Subject:
|
Re: Why these news groups were created
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:31:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6537 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd, just a non-partisan comment here to say thank-you for making this post.
Whether they agree or disagree with its content, I hope all the readers
appreciate the fact that you provided some kind of "official statement". As a
long time (albeit sporadic) Member of LUGNET, I certainly do.
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Todd Lehman wrote:
> In fact, everyone should probably take a few minutes to review their
> <http://news.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=11913 skip filter settings>
> periodically.
And I never knew this existed until now, thanx! :]
> The fact is that while LUGNET respects all religious
> beliefs, it is also religion-neutral. Thus, religous beliefs play no role
> here in determining whether or not the creation of an LGBT group is
> warranted.
I find this very interesting, academically. Something for the mind to chew
on...
> Peace to all, and may we all continue to love and grow.
I know you were probably being sincere, but for some reason I'm picturing you
with a big smirk on your face when you typed this. ;]
KDJ
______________________________
LUGNETer #203, Ontario, Canada
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Why these news groups were created
|
| Long ago, when lugnet.people was created, the idea of subgroups was entertained. Possible subgroups envisioned at the time included Kids, Teens, Parents, and NSLOs. At the time, LUGNET was still small, and it was felt that creating these subgroups (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.announce, FTX) !!
|
151 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
