| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) I guess I'll reserve comment until I see how this gets used, but I'm really hoping it doesn't sound a death knell for use of news readers. One favor to ask though, while URL links show up as still clickable in a newsreader, all the nifty set (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
neat - can we make something that will filter out all the FTX in mail and NNTP? Currently, all the new posts show up as text/x-ftx, and until I tell mutt that that's plain text (with some noise), it doesn't display it at all. But cool for the web (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
I no longer have this problem. Jaco (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
I am very happy to announce three changes today to the LUGNET News web interface: Fixed-width font now used for plain-text messages. Once upon a time, when LUGNET first served up messages via the web, messages were displayed in a fixed-width font. (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX) !!
|
|
| | Re: RFC: lugnet.build.aircraft
|
|
(...) If they're minifig scaled, can't they go in .Town, or maybe .modelteam if they're more detailed? I'm just thinking that .build.aircraft might be a bit specialized compared to stuff like .build.military, which encompasses military troops, (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | RFC: lugnet.build.aircraft
|
|
There is no appropriate place on LUGNET for Aircraft MOC's. If they are military planes, then they can be posted in lugnet.build.military, but for commercial or private aircraft models there is no single best place. I propose lugnet.build.aircraft (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.military)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:HFK23q.1ruD@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) used too! Mike (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
(...) Actually the .overview files weren't the culprit (which is good, because I was about to go insane trying to figure out why, if they were). The culprit was that when I applied this fix retro-actively to old articles: (URL) made backup/archive (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
Todd Lehman <todd@lugnet.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:HFJzt6.13I2@lugnet.com... (...) I think sunday or monday (18. or 19. May). But as I synchronized the newsgroups yet the problems with "not downloaded" news are gone. Has anybody else noticed (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
(...) OK, that's consistent with the quoted-printable fix.[1] Quoted-printable tended to be more used in some areas and not in others. (...) Thanks for the list, Mike. Question: Is it fixed now? --Todd [1] (URL) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: NNTP interface broken?
|
|
(...) Ah, OK. I get the same thing by telnetting to port 119. Thanks. (...) OK, this group is correct. The last article number is 188, and there are 186 articles present, because 2 in this group were cancelled. (...) OK, this group is incorrect. The (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: NNTP interface broken?
|
|
Ok, it seems you just fix it. This is what I get now: GROUP lugnet.loc.it 211 13087 1 13106 lugnet.loc.it "estimated" < "last": OE is fine with it. Thanks. BTW: why is "estimated" <> "last" - "first"? -- Cheers Carlo LugNet #24 (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
Hello Todd, (...) fix (...) seems you just did it because now I don't have that error anymore. Thank you ;) Carsten (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:HFK0u1.1Do7@lugnet.com... (...) would (...) and (...) matching (...) fix (...) What is wierd is that it isn't affecting all groups. For example, lugnet.admin.nntp works fine. I am having (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: NNTP interface broken?
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:HFK07y.17Mo@lugnet.com... (...) It is just the NNTP part of the packets. I just did a trace with Ethereal, and this is what I get: GROUP lugnet.loc.eu 211 186 1 188 lugnet.loc.eu GROUP (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
(...) a-HA! That's the date that I applied the new 'quoted-printable' fix retroactively (to old articles). I haven't a clue, however, why this would confuse Outlook, because the fix only applies to the bodies of messages and not to headers (although (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: NNTP interface broken?
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:HFJtGH.44C@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped .. .] (...) to (...) is (...) In the last week or so. I was on the road for a good portion of last week and didn't reach LUGNET as much as I normally do. I (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: NNTP interface broken?
|
|
(...) What kind of trace is that? It doesn't look like a raw NNTP capture. Anyway, could you try something for me? Of those 283 messages, pick a few and download them, then restart Outlook and see how many it reports. (...) If you happen to know (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:HFJzt6.13I2@lugnet.com... (...) It started 05/21/2003. -- Cheers Carlo LugNet #24 (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Outlook Express and LUGNet
|
|
Hi! For me it started between the 20th and 24th... i can't pinpoint it more exactly since i created the account a copule of times. Play well Carsten "Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:HFJzt6.13I2@lugnet.com... (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|