 | | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) Sounds like you're the one who needs to relax. Read Mark's post... probably better than I could write in reply to you. Dude, chill out, the inflammatory nature of your messages telling people to relax is pretty durn hypocritical. -Tim (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) There are specific guidelines set up on the newsgroups to keep things orderly. If people posted anywhere they liked, things would get rather messy and confusing. When I was a newbie, I posted an auction announcement to .space, and people (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) Why not?? I mean true, it is not for trade - but it is for SALE and you can BUY it - right? I think sometimes you people have lost sight of the forest, AND are missing the trees while you are at it. R-E-L-A-X !!!! (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
All in all, what does it really matter???? I mean, they made a SPECIAL effort to offer these sets to US FIRST - they could have easily ignored us alltogether, but no - They gave us first shot. I would definitely say this belongs in all of the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd, can you explain the search function again?
|
|
(...) I should say can't always; the first reply was just after a meeting and just before lunch -- happened to check in and see it just after you posted it. (...) Ah, neat...it worked. I love Forte Free Agent! And it's really nice on my Crusoe (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd, can you explain the search function again?
|
|
(...) other rather than as separate "words," ya? My parser doesn't expect the < and the > to occur in the same word. I'll need to fix that before you can put them so close together. If you type <10 >10 (note the space character between the "0" and (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Block List?
|
|
"Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:G8nrIv.KFs@lugnet.com... (...) Make that two annoying (and this second one incredibly rude and arrogant) posters. -Tim (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd, can you explain the search function again?
|
|
(...) (URL)There's also this, which isn't linked in yet: (...) I know the previous search was suspected of causing you system-wide problems but the cool thing about it was being able to search for posts made by particular individuals and getting (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Block List?
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G8K59x.LF3@lugnet.com... (...) Well I finally blocked a very annoying poster on my newsreader, and would like to do that on the web too. (...) Cool... can we talk tomorrow about this at BC? (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Posting Failure to lugnet robotics
|
|
I have been trying for a week or two to get posting via email working. It works via the web, but I can not get it to work via mail. I get the followng response: Your message could not be accepted. Response from the news server: 441 Invalid mailer: (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
