To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 8542
8541  |  8543
Subject: 
Re: Uselessness of .debate
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Tue, 19 Dec 2000 03:34:12 GMT
Viewed: 
32 times
  
Larry Pieniazek wrote:

In lugnet.admin.general, Christopher L. Weeks writes:

Also, would it
be possible to publically or privately censure those who post inappropriately?
That would be uncomfortable, but could we get used to it?
It runs the risk of
inflaming emotions, but if we could learn to suck it up, the payoff might be
really good.

I assume you mean "informally" in that for example, Frank sends me a note
telling me to cool it... or vice versa. (because if you mean formally we're
back to a moderator/council/review thingie)

Well, my post seems to have shut down some of the pointless shouting,
and there seems to be some interesting debate starting to creep from
under the rocks it dove for cover behind... I'm still going to let it
chill for a while and see if this (2nd) call to arms gets those who have
been dragging the debates down into the sewer will acknowledge (even if
only to themselves) what they're doing and cut it out.

It's also brought out some good thought from folks that they want a good
debate forum, which is good. If people want a good debate forum, it's
got a better chance of happening.

I think that's a good idea. More... I think it already happens. There are a
number of people I'd gladly take that input from (and have in the past) and
there are a number of people I've given it to (and suspect they gladly took
it from me).

Not that we should need Todd to step in, but a "cool it" from Todd would
probably be pretty universally respected (and Todd has rarely
participated in .debate).

We could institute our own version of the Nazi rule (oops, I just lost
this debate, oh well...), though how to characterize the Christian
shouting without squelching constructive use of religion in debate
(which has occurred, though it often opens the hole for the Christian
shouters to step in).

Frank



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Uselessness of .debate
 
(...) I assume you mean "informally" in that for example, Frank sends me a note telling me to cool it... or vice versa. (because if you mean formally we're back to a moderator/council/review thingie) I think that's a good idea. More... I think it (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)

90 Messages in This Thread:
































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR