 | | Re: Web interface "ignore user"
|
|
(...) even (...) Right. I pointed this out in my original post. (...) Not looking for a perfect solution, merely an amelioration. And this question is partly a curiosity one, I admit. (...) Fixed price or T&M? Send me a quote and I'll consider it. (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Web interface "ignore user"
|
|
(...) The funny thing about killfiling someone is that you still end up sometimes seeing what they wrote inside of replies when people quote them (I think this is pretty common). You might also accidentally click on a link that someone made to their (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Web interface "ignore user"
|
|
Todd, There's one particular user that I am itching to ignore, I'd like to not even see his posts, as they have a tendency to get me riled up and saying rash things, he's so clueless and rude. Is this a doable thing on the web interface (on news, (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | advanced search options?
|
|
Todd, I've been meaning to ask about this for some time. 1. "Most Recent, First": There are times when I need to find "some message posted recently" about some particular subject, in some particular directory, and when I search for that subject (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
(...) Well, keep your eye out for it, I guess, but in the meantime I'll ask the server to take care of you with a new pw. I got your other reply from your primary address, BTW. (...) I think you just did now (earlier this week), but I wouldn't agree (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G20t6H.4us@lugnet.com... (...) news:G1zGDI.4Iy@lugnet.com... (...) is (...) addresses (...) show (...) membership (...) I, too, am wondering that <g>... (...) That was inside the membership (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
(...) OK, that helps. I'll have the server send an e-mail to each of the addresses you listed. Hopefully, one of those is still active and you can reply to show that you received it. But there are a couple of other issues: (1) What happened to your (...) (26 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
DBR <assman@finalfrontier.com> wrote in message news:G1zGDI.4Iy@lugnet.com... (...) address (...) member (...) you're (...) (Generally I do write words in my messages, sorry) Dylan (Bradley) Reardon: Member no. 253 -- "To infinity and beyond!" (26 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G1zDMo.MIK@lugnet.com... (...) password, (...) I (...) have (...) confusion. (...) ID (...) three (...) (26 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
(...) Hmm, wait, now I'm confused. I don't see you listed. What is your member ID number? Anyway, by primary email I meant the first one of the (up to) three that you gave when you signed up to be a member. But I think maybe you're confusing (...) (26 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G1EAr4.F49@lugnet.com... (...) stuff, (...) primary (...) send (...) one (...) Oh, hi Todd. I should have checked this NG before emailing you... Anyway, I emailed you about <thinking> 5 (?) (...) (26 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LCad Parts Update 2000-02 Now Available
|
|
(...) I'm working on it as I type. Neat trick, eh? Whoops, gotta go. It just finished a process. Steve (26 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Reducing fussiness in automated password appraisal
|
|
(...) I found a big difference too. I have 4 or 5 passwords I use for my "non-critical" logins, and on the old system (lvl 2) they got a mixture of good & weak. On the new system they all get great on lvl 2 and good on lvl 3, so I agree, maybe lvl 3 (...) (26 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: dead links
|
|
(...) Jeremy Sproat and a couple others were working on it a while back and made quite a bit of progress -- check the .faq group archives for old discussions -- but I think due to time considerations it has stagnated. One thing I'd like to see in a (...) (26 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: dead links
|
|
(...) Ah yes, thanks, (another loose-ends casualty of the news move of the summer -- they were using server-relative URLs)... Fixed now. Thanks again. --Todd (26 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO SET GUIDE - The Big Picture ?
|
|
(...) No and Yes. No, the code/feature is the same -- it has always (since the new set guide went up a few weeks ago) displayed the "larger" (where available) image when you click the medium-size image. Yes, the 6990 image changed yesterday -- I (...) (26 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: dead links
|
|
I've been thinking about this as well. And I will volunteer my time toward creating either the database or the traditional faq. As it is, I often search the newsgroups for past answers and it is often fruitless, even when the information I seek is (...) (26 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: dead links
|
|
This brings up a question of mine, which there might be an answer for but I am not clear on. Will there ever be a 'LUGNET FAQ' encompassing all of these?? Is there someone or some group of people working on assembling data for that? I'd certainly (...) (26 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | dead links
|
|
These links rec.toys.lego (RTL) FAQ and Auction & Shipping FAQ on this page (URL) to be dead. Scott A (26 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LCad Parts Update 2000-02 Now Available
|
|
(...) Now that the update is available, will the parts reference on lugnet updated as well? The web reference is a really nice feature ;-) Regards, Hakan (...) (26 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.general)
|
