 | | Re: LEGO SET GUIDE - The Big Picture ?
|
|
(...) Is this new? I'm pretty sure that when I looked at this the other day both the big and small images linked to the same file - the smaller one was only shrunk. I am also 100% sure that the 6990 image changed since yesterday. Scott A (...) etc.) (...) (26 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO SET GUIDE - The Big Picture ?
|
|
(...) Hey, even a stopped clock is right 2 times a day (only once if you're in the military, there's a moral there somewhere...) Scott's right more often than you think, Shiri. I just usually think he could phrase stuff more smoothly, that's all. If (...) (26 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO SET GUIDE - The Big Picture ?
|
|
(...) Ya, I'm not bothered by it either, and the medium-sized default images aren't necessarily always smaller (most of the time they are, but not always -- it depends on the size of the originating scan). A smaller initial image makes for much (...) (26 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Reducing fussiness in automated password appraisal
|
|
(...) Certainly *way* easier to pass. I'd even suggest using level 3. Level 2 passes "c00l!" (just barely). Would it be possible to kick up the relative strength of the dictionary check a bit? (26 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO SET GUIDE - The Big Picture ?
|
|
Actually, Scott, clicking on this: (...) (URL) clicked on "open link in new window" to find out what the link was, BTW). Maybe Todd just found the time to fix it. ;-) (...) Seems like history was made - Scott and Larry aren't disagreeing, if not (...) (26 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO SET GUIDE - The Big Picture ?
|
|
(...) Not sure I'm "bothered" per se but I do agree that I find the images less satisfactory now than before, and the extra steps to get a large image are extra work. ++Lar (26 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | LEGO SET GUIDE - The Big Picture ?
|
|
One of the big advantages Brickset has over the LUGNET set guide is the quality of the images. When I use either guide usually I just want a good look at the set to see what parts it contains etc. All the extra information now on the set guide (...) (26 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Reducing fussiness in automated password appraisal
|
|
Many people feel that the Member password checks on LUGNET are overly stringent -- that it is too hard to come up with a good password that passes the strength appraisal: (URL) is also comfortable to remember. In anticipation of lowering the (...) (26 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Is the "traffic" page off-line?
|
|
(...) d'Oh! -- you're right. I added some code deep-down for slowing and blocking HTTP accesses from IP addresses which appear to be attempting pw intrusions, and the code there checks the IP address and asserts that it's defined and of the standard (...) (26 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Is the "traffic" page off-line?
|
|
Todd, I have been trying to access the Traffic screen and I am a receiving a "webpage does not exist, yada, yada, yada" window from webtv... (and you know how annoying yada, yada, yadas are = ) John (26 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: When will Lugnet offer XXL, XXXL and XXXXL shirts?
|
|
(...) Working on it now. --Todd (26 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | When will Lugnet offer XXL, XXXL and XXXXL shirts?
|
|
Cafepress.com is now offering shirts in these larger sizes! I was hoping to get a 2X Lugnet shirt, but noticed that we can still only buy the smaller sizes. Todd, when are you going to offer the larger sizes for Lugnet shirts? The Lugnet stores on (...) (26 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Posting question
|
|
I posted a message yesterday about a sale at Fred Meyer. I guess I named my posting the same as an earlier posting and it was sent to this previous heading as a response. Why did this happen. We use a news reader and when a message is posted to an (...) (26 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: pw checking (was: Re: LUGNET Memberships)
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G1L15F.K94@lugnet.com... [snip] (...) client (...) if (...) to (...) been (...) reason. (...) follow (...) it (...) Why would it have been a mistake to protect them? IMHO, if anyone can fake a (...) (26 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Nuke Boston (was Re: Resolved: Tall SUVs should not be...)
|
|
(...) True - I actually went to .fun first, but didn't think a joke fit into Community, Gaming, Party, Crafts, or Holiday, and didn't realize that I could post directly to .fun, because when I had tried to post directly to (IIRC) .marketplace, it (...) (26 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Set List Question
|
|
I noticed that I can go back and edit what I wrote in...so I have done that. -- Thomas Main main@appstate.edu (...) (26 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | pw checking (was: Re: LUGNET Memberships)
|
|
(...) Well, enough new things that I think it will be hard for anyone to continue belittling the checking anymore. Plus, as I said before, it's possible (and likely, I hope) that the checking will be less stringent. Right now I'm guesstimating that (...) (26 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
(...) I was thinking more from the perspective of what you are going to create that will have a span of 9 months and not what might happen on the internet outside of LUGNET in 9 months. This still doesn't explain why you have a sophisticated (...) (26 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
|
(...) that (...) Is this debate flamebait? Or sarcasm The FDIC needs to do risk based underwriting instead of charging all banks the same rates. Online banks with lax security should have to pay higher premiums. FUT .debate if you must (seems (...) (26 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Password Tips
|
|
(...) Easially? (...) Hey, we better enhance the tester to prevent that password, it's kind of sort of easy to remember. <GD&R> Seriously, I like the active anti cracker defense idea a lot better and I think that's the better way to solve the (...) (26 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
