To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 7828
7827  |  7829
Subject: 
Re: LUGNET Memberships
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Thu, 28 Sep 2000 04:17:11 GMT
Viewed: 
2875 times
  
In lugnet.people, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.people, Mike Faunce writes:
> > > We'll see how many people find it funny nine months from now.
> > So ... are you going to tell us what is going to happen nine months from
> > now or just leave us hanging?
> 
> A combination of things...  first, by then there will be more things in
> place that will matter more; second, the pw validator will very likely be
> less stringent; third, I predict that within the next nine months, a major
> online banking site such as PayPal will have a major fiasco in the news with
> tens or hundreds of thousands of user accounts having been either cracked
> via a distributed stealth parallel cracking system or DoS'd through a
> distributed and carefully orchestrated DoS attack based on the principle that
> they lock someone of their account out if a small number of multiple login
> attempts fail rather than having more stringent pw requirements and allowing
> a larger number of fails.

I was thinking more from the perspective of what you are going to create that
will have a span of 9 months and not what might happen on the internet outside
of LUGNET in 9 months.
This still doesn't explain why you have a sophisticated password system
(including a dictionary of 3 million words in 20 languages which I assume is
for the password check alone?) that doesn't really protect any vital
information while at the same time you have a security hole on the other end
where people can post under other's names.



Message has 1 Reply:
  pw checking (was: Re: LUGNET Memberships)
 
(...) Well, enough new things that I think it will be hard for anyone to continue belittling the checking anymore. Plus, as I said before, it's possible (and likely, I hope) that the checking will be less stringent. Right now I'm guesstimating that (...) (26 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LUGNET Memberships
 
(...) A combination of things... first, by then there will be more things in place that will matter more; second, the pw validator will very likely be less stringent; third, I predict that within the next nine months, a major online banking site (...) (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)

113 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR