 | | Re: Member info on LUGNET?
|
|
(...) Yes, me too, actually. I thought Todd's map stuff was so cool. (26 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Member info on LUGNET?
|
|
(...) And don't forgot that awesome little idea proposed in LUGNET's manifesto where you get to put a micro-LEGO house into a town map with the other members. That's one of the biggest reasons I joined LUGNET: nice house, good neighbourhood, no (...) (26 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Member info on LUGNET?
|
|
(...) Whoa that was fast! Thanx Todd :] Yeah, that linked minifig picture is pretty prominant, I just never noticed it was a link. But I'm not seeing the "Members link at the top of the page". Must be blindness again... Thanx, KDJ ___...___ Kyle D. (...) (26 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Member info on LUGNET?
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:Fzo7xr.LF7@lugnet.com... (...) page. I (...) link that (...) be a (...) those (...) other (...) other (...) Something like members.lugnet.com? Cool! :) Would this begin to include search by (...) (26 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Member info on LUGNET?
|
|
(...) For now, click the picture of the minifigs and then you can click the other lists. Or you can click the Members link at the top and then click the other lists. We're looking at making a new-domain just for members, which would greatly expand (...) (26 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Member info on LUGNET?
|
|
G'day Todd & Suzanne, I've noticed something with the latest incarnation of the LUGNET home page. I cannot find an easy way to look up other LUGNET members. There is a link that pulls up everybody, I think in "chronological" order. But there used (...) (26 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Trailing Slashes (Re: Stick in the mud...)
|
|
(...) That's what I heard too. Hmm. That jives with my findings from MSIE3 long ago -- it was confused about the coloring. But here, this is an even worse bug. Steve, what version of MSIE are you seeing this with? The thing is, if you've never (...) (26 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Trailing Slashes (Re: Stick in the mud...)
|
|
(...) In cases where there isn't a redirection, it shouldn't do anything fancy to it. How would that not fix the issue? Maybe I misunderstood the problem. I thought you were saying that IE stores (URL) and (URL) as (URL) and (URL) in the history. (...) (26 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Trailing Slashes (Re: Stick in the mud...)
|
|
(...) That wouldn't fix the issue with LUGNET, because LUGNET doesn't redirect san-trailing-slash hits. Steve (26 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The 2001 lineup (list on FBTB)
|
|
(...) Excellent point. If it were not for ambiguity and not asking stupid questions, there would be no instruction archive. KL (26 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Trailing Slashes (Re: Stick in the mud...)
|
|
(...) It's a technical bug. :) It's alright for IE to generally assume that they are the same for the purposes of making a history, but it's wrong to use a mechanism that doesn't work if they're different. Web servers generally return a 301 Moved (...) (26 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: (cancelled)-why
|
|
(...) From me: first, I decided my post was trivial and a bit too pedantic for .lego.direct. So I got rid of it. Then, I made a post with a big grammatical error renderinging it hard to understand. So I superseded it. (26 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The 2001 lineup (list on FBTB)
|
|
(...) Be careful what you wish for. You work for IBM, you know how large corporations are, once you ask for a definitive statement it often comes out very restrictive. Sometimes ambiguity is better. (even if it's unpleasant for the audience at home (...) (26 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Trailing Slashes (Re: Stick in the mud...)
|
|
(...) Technically, yes. Human-factors-wise, no -- most people see them as the same. Steve (26 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: There's no such thing as a bad MOC builder (was: Re: New MF model.)
|
|
(...) <GRIN> Who, me? There might be one or two areas where I think myself above average but I can name lots where I would stink, were I to try. (Mecha come to mind, for one) (...) Ya, these two points are really the best way to go as it were. (...) (26 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Please lower noise
|
|
"Fredrik Glöckner" <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote in message news:qrdwvhbvvay.fsf....uio.no... (...) Hmm.... I think that there should be some happy medium between Todd & Suz's idea of the group, and your thoughts of how it will be. It should (...) (26 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: (cancelled)-why
|
|
(...) I frequently cancel my messages when I make a spelling mistake, or if I write something and the discover that it was not relevant anyway. And some times when I have used a bit "heated" language, and regret just afterwards. Fredrik (26 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Please lower noise
|
|
(...) I agree with the intentions of your post as well as the intentions to keep the noise down at lugnet.lego(.*), however I don't think this will be fruitful. Whenever there are interesting posts, people will feel like following up with their (...) (26 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (cancelled)-why
|
|
Why so many cancelled messages? Scott A (26 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
