To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 7596
7595  |  7597
Subject: 
Re: There's no such thing as a bad MOC builder (was: Re: New MF model.)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Mon, 21 Aug 2000 13:12:57 GMT
Viewed: 
3796 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Selçuk Göre writes:

> If I know you a little bit this "best" above is you, isn't it?..:-)

<GRIN> Who, me? There might be one or two areas where I think myself above
average but I can name lots where I would stink, were I to try. (Mecha come to
mind, for one)

> For the reasons above, I prefer making "wow!" type of critics for the
> MOCs that I really amazed, but remain silent for the MOCs that don't
> make me impressed.
> 
> Making some technical suggestions like "I think you can convert this
> landing gear to retractable type by adding such and such" is of course
> always acceptable.

Ya, these two points are really the best way to go as it were.

However I still myself welcome non technical feedback, positive *or*
negative... perhaps people who welcome it should say so in their "new MOC"
presentations because I would hate not to get the really important (that is,
less than glowing) feedback because someone feared hurting my feelings.

++Lar



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: There's no such thing as a bad MOC builder (was: Re: New MF model.)
 
(...) If I know you a little bit this "best" above is you, isn't it?..:-) Besides the silly joke, from the artist-seller point of view, you are of course right. But from the "recreation time builder" point of view not quite so. Many people here (...) (26 years ago, 18-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

4 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR