To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 7596
7595  |  7597
Subject: 
Re: There's no such thing as a bad MOC builder (was: Re: New MF model.)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Mon, 21 Aug 2000 13:12:57 GMT
Viewed: 
366 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Selçuk Göre writes:

If I know you a little bit this "best" above is you, isn't it?..:-)

<GRIN> Who, me? There might be one or two areas where I think myself above
average but I can name lots where I would stink, were I to try. (Mecha come to
mind, for one)

For the reasons above, I prefer making "wow!" type of critics for the
MOCs that I really amazed, but remain silent for the MOCs that don't
make me impressed.

Making some technical suggestions like "I think you can convert this
landing gear to retractable type by adding such and such" is of course
always acceptable.

Ya, these two points are really the best way to go as it were.

However I still myself welcome non technical feedback, positive *or*
negative... perhaps people who welcome it should say so in their "new MOC"
presentations because I would hate not to get the really important (that is,
less than glowing) feedback because someone feared hurting my feelings.

++Lar



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: There's no such thing as a bad MOC builder (was: Re: New MF model.)
 
(...) If I know you a little bit this "best" above is you, isn't it?..:-) Besides the silly joke, from the artist-seller point of view, you are of course right. But from the "recreation time builder" point of view not quite so. Many people here (...) (24 years ago, 18-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

4 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR