To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 7548
7547  |  7549
Subject: 
Re: There's no such thing as a bad MOC builder (was: Re: New MF model.)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:40:30 GMT
Viewed: 
212 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Adrick Tolliver writes:
In lugnet.starwars, Todd Lehman writes:
Ooook -- eeep -- opppp -- orkkk -- red flag alert!

(Cut alot of good stuff Todd wrote)

Way to go, Todd!  I was going to post something like that, but you beat me to
it!  I still have some things I want to say, but I'm going to wait untill
tomarrow to post them.  See you all then!

Adrick Tolliver

Well. How best to put this?

I *know* I agree with Todd in spirit. But we all have opinions, likes and
dislikes. While there are no "bad" builders, I think we all would agree that
there might be models that we personally like more, and some that we
personally like less, and some builders are ones that seem to produce a lot of
models we like, and some that don't. There's no accounting for taste, mind
you, but I don't want to be in a wishy washy world where I can't say anything
not uniformly glowing...

I personally would prefer to know if I put up a model that wasn't very well
liked by anyone. But then I'm trying to design models that people will like,
moreover, that people will want to buy. So I would welcome constructive
criticism, addressed directly to me, presented in a polite manner. That's how
one gets better. And even the best of us should want to get better, right?

That is a hugely different thing than saying (as an aside) "that guy never
produces anything worthwhile, ignore him" which I think we all would agree is
not very polite. Beyond the pale, actually. But let's not go so overboard in
politeness that we fear to give constructive suggestions for improvement that
reflect our own opinions, our own likes and dislikes, as well as our knowledge
of accepted practice and innovative ways to accomplish things.

Did I put that delicately enough? Somewhere in the middle is the right place
to be, as usual.

++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: There's no such thing as a bad MOC builder (was: Re: New MF model.)
 
(...) If I know you a little bit this "best" above is you, isn't it?..:-) Besides the silly joke, from the artist-seller point of view, you are of course right. But from the "recreation time builder" point of view not quite so. Many people here (...) (24 years ago, 18-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: There's no such thing as a bad MOC builder (was: Re: New MF model.)
 
(...) (Cut alot of good stuff Todd wrote) Way to go, Todd! I was going to post something like that, but you beat me to it! I still have some things I want to say, but I'm going to wait untill tomarrow to post them. See you all then! Adrick Tolliver (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

4 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR