 | | Re: Space Shuttle #1682 —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | (...) One more thing, Perhaps you should reword item 11 in the Terms of Use: " 11. Post auction announcements, updates, or listings in discussion groups which do not explicitly welcome their presence." Seems to me like the Space topic would welcome (...) (24 years ago, 2-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Space Shuttle #1682 —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) No, not really. I think that "which do not explicitly welcome their presence" is pretty straightforward and easy to understand. If you're wondering if a group explicitly welcomes auction announcements, chances are it doesn't. (...) Well, that (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Space Shuttle #1682 —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | (...) Well, jeez, since _you_ think it's straightforward, everyone else must too. I am a newbie here, but since I saw these posts, I thought it might be ok. (URL) these are not necessarily auction offers, but they are offers that should be in one of (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Space Shuttle #1682 —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | Sortafast wrote in message ... (...) Part of the confusion is that buy/sell/trade/shopping posts are ok in other groups, though they should be used sparingly. Todd, I think it would help if there was a T&C item which mentioned (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Space Shuttle #1682 —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Any cancellation or movement is editorial control. This isn't IBM, we're out in public here, you can't make surrendering rights part of your terms of employment. That said, I STILL think it's a good idea if we can just solve how to do it in a (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Space Shuttle #1682 —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | (...) While I'm sure you're being sarcastic here, I'd like to point out that I'm not perfect like Larry. I do sometimes make mistakes, and in those rare instances, I am sure there are people who, rightly so, disagree with me. I'm pretty sure most (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Space Shuttle #1682 —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | (...) Of course in Massachusetts, a right followed by a left allows one to make a "left turn on red" (the trick of course is you pull into the gas station on the right, and then make a left onto the street you wanted to turn left onto in the first (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Space Shuttle #1682 —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Now while this is true it is not the only case where a combination of rights and or lefts constitute and right or at a minimum getting you to where you are going 1/2 a minute faster in Massachusetts. Lets see... I have seen all of these with (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Space Shuttle #1682 —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) This he says after no less than **6** examples! Besides, the sites of these infractions can be changed to protect the guilty, all we want are the cites. (24 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Space Shuttle #1682 —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Seconded. (...) Hey! I resemble that remark. Er, I mean RESENT that remark, ya that's it... Pomposity through obfuscation and circumlocution... (24 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Space Shuttle #1682 —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | I think all this would be solved if the larger themes(technic, space, castle & pirate ) had their on trade groups. Scott A (...) -- Scott A My Lego Site : (URL) List : (URL) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
