To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 2986
2985  |  2987
Subject: 
Re: Lugnet Newsgroups Anniversary!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Mon, 4 Oct 1999 20:10:18 GMT
Viewed: 
2774 times
  
Todd Lehman wrote:

> This being the eve of the anniversary, I'd be interested in hearing
> people's thoughts on how things have turned out so far, and whether things
> have lived up to or failed to meet people's expectations -- particularly
> with respect to the hopes expressed in the announcement (attached below).

I think LUGNET is one of the best sites on the web! The site
concentrates on a specific topic, is easy to navigate, and it contains
lots and lots of information and links to relevant places. The
three-gates-access is excelent, everybody can participate in the way
he/she likes best. Good Job.

By the way, could the mail gate way set the reply-to field to point to
the discussion group and the original writer? It's kind of annoys me
that I have to write the address to the group myself.

Jacob

--
/* Our e-mail addresses have changed.  anne.jacob@get2net is only for
messages which are ment for both of us. Anne's mail should be sent to
eowyn@get2net.dk and mine to  dungeonmaster@get2net.dk  (prefered) or
c948605@student.dtu.dk.     *** Geek by nature - Linux by choice ***/



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Lugnet Newsgroups Anniversary!
 
I for one, love it. I have met great people, talked about one of the passions of my life, got sets I never dreamed I could, debated things I never would with people I would have never met, and have so many things I want to build now, I want to go (...) (27 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lugnet Newsgroups Anniversary!
 
(...) Aha -- found it! Here's that message: (URL) 'Date' header says "4 Oct 1998 00:00:00 GMT", which is obviously wrong, but there's another header which says "04 Oct 1998 17:13:50 CDT", which sounds right on. So if my TZ math is correct, this (...) (27 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.announce)

43 Messages in This Thread:

























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR