To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 2674
2673  |  2675
Subject: 
Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Fri, 20 Aug 1999 20:51:58 GMT
Viewed: 
99 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, "John VanZwieten" <john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com>
writes:

Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message
news:37bc7cfc.266795260@lugnet.com...
In lugnet.admin.general, blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) writes:
Maybe the voting announcement should just have all followups set
to cad.dev.

That's the solution right there.

Except that lcd doesn't allow DAT content either.  Does it?

Yup, lugnet.cad.dev allows DAT content, but doesn't require* it.

Could a group be designed to require DAT content to an initial post, but
not to follow-ups?

Yeah.  You mean like all of the .cad.dat.* sub-groups?  That sounds like an
excellent idea.


(Yes I realize this may be more trouble than it's worth, so please don't
take this as some kind of "demand.")

Not much trouble at all.

--Todd



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
 
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:37bc7cfc.266795...net.com... (...) Could a group be designed to require DAT content to an initial post, but not to follow-ups? (Yes I realize this may be more trouble than it's worth, so please (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

8 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR