General Discussions about LUGNET : 2664


Administrative / General / 2664	2663 \| 2665

Subject:	Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.general
Date:	Thu, 19 Aug 1999 20:47:10 GMT
Viewed:	225 times

On Thu, 19 Aug 1999 17:07:24 GMT, "John VanZwieten" <john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> wrote: > Maybe the voting announcement should just have all followups set to cad.dev. That's the solution right there. Except that lcd doesn't allow DAT content either. Does it? Steve

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:37bc6cfc.238280...net.com... (...) Well, mine went through today in cad.dev, but not cad.dev.org.ldraw. Note that it was only 1 line of DAT content, as actual DAT files belong in the (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

		Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
(...) Yup, lugnet.cad.dev allows DAT content, but doesn't require* it. --Todd * The only group which has ever actually required DAT content is the obsolete lugnet.cad.dat group. (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
If we are going to crosspost the parts voting thread to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, then we should allow .dat content there. Often a post about a correction to a part will include a few lines of .dat content. A reply of mine was just rejected b/c it (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

8 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search