General Discussions about LUGNET : 2666


Administrative / General / 2666	2665 \| 2667

Subject:	Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.general
Date:	Thu, 19 Aug 1999 21:55:50 GMT
Viewed:	87 times

In lugnet.admin.general, blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) writes: > > Maybe the voting announcement should just have all followups set > > to cad.dev. > > That's the solution right there. > > Except that lcd doesn't allow DAT content either. Does it? Yup, lugnet.cad.dev allows DAT content, but doesn't require* it. --Todd * The only group which has ever actually required DAT content is the obsolete lugnet.cad.dat group.

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:37bc7cfc.266795...net.com... (...) Could a group be designed to require DAT content to an initial post, but not to follow-ups? (Yes I realize this may be more trouble than it's worth, so please (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
(...) That's the solution right there. Except that lcd doesn't allow DAT content either. Does it? Steve (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

8 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search