General Discussions about LUGNET : 2673


Administrative / General / 2673	2672 \| 2674

Subject:	Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.general
Date:	Fri, 20 Aug 1999 14:09:40 GMT
Viewed:	256 times

Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:37bc7cfc.266795260@lugnet.com... > In lugnet.admin.general, blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) writes: > > > Maybe the voting announcement should just have all followups set > > > to cad.dev. > > > > That's the solution right there. > > > > Except that lcd doesn't allow DAT content either. Does it? > > Yup, lugnet.cad.dev allows DAT content, but doesn't require* it. Could a group be designed to require DAT content to an initial post, but not to follow-ups? (Yes I realize this may be more trouble than it's worth, so please don't take this as some kind of "demand.") -John Van

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
(...) Yeah. You mean like all of the .cad.dat.* sub-groups? That sounds like an excellent idea. (...) Not much trouble at all. --Todd (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
(...) Yup, lugnet.cad.dev allows DAT content, but doesn't require* it. --Todd * The only group which has ever actually required DAT content is the obsolete lugnet.cad.dat group. (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

8 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search