To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 2673
2672  |  2674
Subject: 
Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Fri, 20 Aug 1999 14:09:40 GMT
Viewed: 
99 times
  
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message
news:37bc7cfc.266795260@lugnet.com...
In lugnet.admin.general, blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) writes:
Maybe the voting announcement should just have all followups set
to cad.dev.

That's the solution right there.

Except that lcd doesn't allow DAT content either.  Does it?

Yup, lugnet.cad.dev allows DAT content, but doesn't require* it.


Could a group be designed to require DAT content to an initial post, but not to
follow-ups?

(Yes I realize this may be more trouble than it's worth, so please don't take
this as some kind of "demand.")

-John Van



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
 
(...) Yeah. You mean like all of the .cad.dat.* sub-groups? That sounds like an excellent idea. (...) Not much trouble at all. --Todd (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
 
(...) Yup, lugnet.cad.dev allows DAT content, but doesn't require* it. --Todd * The only group which has ever actually required DAT content is the obsolete lugnet.cad.dat group. (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

8 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR