To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 2665
2664  |  2666
Subject: 
Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Thu, 19 Aug 1999 21:04:40 GMT
Viewed: 
245 times
  
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:37bc6cfc.2382808@lugnet.com...
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999 17:07:24 GMT, "John VanZwieten"
<john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> wrote:

Maybe the voting announcement should just have all followups set to cad.dev.

That's the solution right there.

Except that lcd doesn't allow DAT content either.  Does it?


Well, mine went through today in cad.dev, but not cad.dev.org.ldraw.  Note that
it was only 1 line of DAT content, as actual DAT files belong in the cad.dat.*
heirarchy.  But one line was enough for LUGNET to flag it.  It's interesting
that because DAT content was imbedded within a paragraph, it wasn't flagged.

WARNING "a9906\4181P06.DAT" Line 10: Sorry, cannot handle color 24,
using 16:  1 24 0 120 0 0 0 -10 0 0 0 -10 0 0 2-4edge.DAT


-John Van



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
 
(...) That makes sense: DAT code embedded in other text is no longer valid DAT code. Steve (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
 
(...) That's the solution right there. Except that lcd doesn't allow DAT content either. Does it? Steve (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

8 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR