To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 2665
2664  |  2666
Subject: 
Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Thu, 19 Aug 1999 21:04:40 GMT
Viewed: 
3401 times
  
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:37bc6cfc.2382808@lugnet.com...
> On Thu, 19 Aug 1999 17:07:24 GMT, "John VanZwieten"
> <john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> wrote:
> 
> > Maybe the voting announcement should just have all followups set to cad.dev.
> 
> That's the solution right there.
> 
> Except that lcd doesn't allow DAT content either.  Does it?


Well, mine went through today in cad.dev, but not cad.dev.org.ldraw.  Note that
it was only 1 line of DAT content, as actual DAT files belong in the cad.dat.*
heirarchy.  But one line was enough for LUGNET to flag it.  It's interesting
that because DAT content was imbedded within a paragraph, it wasn't flagged.

> WARNING "a9906\4181P06.DAT" Line 10: Sorry, cannot handle color 24,
>  using 16:  1 24 0 120 0 0 0 -10 0 0 0 -10 0 0 2-4edge.DAT


-John Van



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
 
(...) That makes sense: DAT code embedded in other text is no longer valid DAT code. Steve (27 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
 
(...) That's the solution right there. Except that lcd doesn't allow DAT content either. Does it? Steve (27 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

8 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR