To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 2672
2671  |  2673
Subject: 
Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Fri, 20 Aug 1999 13:13:03 GMT
Viewed: 
226 times
  
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999 21:04:40 GMT, "John VanZwieten"
<john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> wrote:

Well, mine went through today in cad.dev, but not cad.dev.org.ldraw.  Note that
it was only 1 line of DAT content, as actual DAT files belong in the cad.dat.*
heirarchy.  But one line was enough for LUGNET to flag it.  It's interesting
that because DAT content was imbedded within a paragraph, it wasn't flagged.

WARNING "a9906\4181P06.DAT" Line 10: Sorry, cannot handle color 24,
using 16:  1 24 0 120 0 0 0 -10 0 0 0 -10 0 0 2-4edge.DAT

That makes sense: DAT code embedded in other text is no longer valid DAT
code.

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Should .dat content be allowed in cad.dev.org.ldraw?
 
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:37bc6cfc.238280...net.com... (...) Well, mine went through today in cad.dev, but not cad.dev.org.ldraw. Note that it was only 1 line of DAT content, as actual DAT files belong in the (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

8 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR