Subject:
|
Re: CFD: lugnet.lego.* newsgroup hierarchy
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Aug 1999 01:54:52 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.org#AntiSpam#
|
Viewed:
|
368 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> There are two main possibilities...one is the anal-retentive structure --
> which attempts to match the official product line as closely as possible...
I'm a big fan of throwing away TLG's naming scheme and using something
logical instead. :) I'd go further than just throwing out "system" -- I'd
reorganize the whole mess.
I realize this comment may not be so helpful, because it doesn't fit well
with your plan of meshing with the set database.... You could reorganize
that too. :)
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: CFD: lugnet.lego.* newsgroup hierarchy
|
| Hi Matthew, Matthew Miller <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message news:slrn7rk4jf.dm1.....bu.edu... (...) possible... (...) I agree here. I believe that if TLG is moving things around and changing numbers and names that it would probably be better. At (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
