To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 2382
2381  |  2383
Subject: 
Re: CFD: lugnet.lego.* newsgroup hierarchy
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Mon, 9 Aug 1999 12:27:07 GMT
Viewed: 
4432 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:

*snip*

> 
> The key here is learning from the /news/ reorganization:  When the news
> stuff was first launched last fall, ALL of the newsgroup stuff was tucked
> away under the /news/ directory, for example:
> 
>   http://www.lugnet.com/news/display.cgi?lugnet.general
>   http://www.lugnet.com/news/display.cgi?lugnet.cad.dev
>   http://www.lugnet.com/news/display.cgi?lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf
> 
> That was the ONLY way to access to the newsgroups by URL from the website...
> yuck.  Now, of course, the URLs are much more sensible:
> 
>   http://www.lugnet.com/general/
>   http://www.lugnet.com/cad/dev/
>   http://www.lugnet.com/loc/us/ca/sf/
> 
> That is, instead of the news stuff staying inside a special little area of
> the website, the website was "turned inside out" to support the news stuff
> throughout.


This is great I really like the new URL/DB structure.  Much more intuitive.


> The same thing should happen with the LEGO products guide.  Instead of it
> staying inside a special little area of the website, the whole website
> should become an area for the products guide.  In other words, just as the
> /news/ was exploded upwards toward the top of the site, there's no reason
> that the /lego/ products area couldn't be exploded updwards.  Thus we could
> have:
> 
>   Newsgroup name                      URL off the website root
>   ==================================  ==================================
>   lugnet.adventurers                  /adventurers/
>   lugnet.aquazone                     /aquazone/
>   lugnet.basic                        /basic/
>   lugnet.belville                     /belville/
>   lugnet.books                        /books/
>   lugnet.boats                        /boats/
>   lugnet.castle                       /castle/
>   lugnet.dacta                        /dacta/
>   lugnet.duplo                        /duplo/
>   lugnet.fabuland                     /fabuland/
>   lugnet.freestyle                    /freestyle/
>   lugnet.mindstorms                   /mindstorms/
>   lugnet.modelteam                    /modelteam/
>   lugnet.pirates                      /pirates/
>   lugnet.primo                        /primo/
>   lugnet.promo                        /promo/
>   lugnet.radiocontrol                 /radiocontrol/
>   lugnet.scala                        /scala/
>   lugnet.service                      /service/
>   lugnet.software.*                   /software/
>   lugnet.software.lego-chess          /software/lego-chess/
>   lugnet.software.lego-creator        /software/lego-creator/
>   lugnet.software.lego-friends        /software/lego-friends/
>   lugnet.software.lego-loco           /software/lego-loco/
>   lugnet.software.lego-racers         /software/lego-racers/
>   lugnet.software.lego-rockraiders    /software/lego-rockraiders/
>   lugnet.software.legoland            /software/legoland/
>   lugnet.space                        /space/
>   lugnet.starwars                     /starwars/
>   lugnet.technic                      /technic/
>   lugnet.town                         /town/
>   lugnet.trains                       /trains/
>   lugnet.underground                  /underground/
>   lugnet.western                      /western/
>   lugnet.znap                         /znap/
> 
> Now, except for a couple oddities, don't those newsgroup names and URLs make
> a lot more sense?  And not only that, there's no longer a questionable
> duplicity between lugnet.trains and lugnet.lego.trains, or between
> lugnet.starwars and lugnet.lego.starwars.  There's still a problem about
> lugnet.mindstorms and lugnet.robotics, but the applications of LEGO
> MINDSTORMS actually go far beyond robotics.
> 
> Does this sound like a good third option?  (It does to me!)
> 
> There's at least one downside of all this flattening-out, though:  the
> number of links on the root homepage would jump from 18 to about 45 instead
> of from 18 to 19 -- meaning that the on-screen display on the root homepage
> might become a bit unweildy.


This definitly seems like it might be a bit unweildy to me, especially as the
LEGO product line grows.  Now I don't know as much as I probably should about
the LEGO product line and how it is structured but I was trying to think of
something that would combine some of these lines to make things a bit less
unweildy.

For example with the space line couldn't you do something like this...

lugnet.space
lugnet.space.classic
lugnet.space.blacktron
lugnet.space.starwars  (this would move lugnet.starwars here)
lugnet.space...

This would put lugnet.space on the main page but move much of the more specific
lines down one level.

Now I notice that you left out lugnet.extreme and lugnet.rescue above or are
they considered part of town?  Maybe the town structure could look something
like...

lugnet.town
lugnet.town.boats
lugnet.town.extreme
lugnet.town.rescue
lugnet.town...

Now I could say something about lugnet.town.trains here but I would probably
get killed and I do think that .trains is unique enough to leave at the top of
the structure.

I would also think that there should be some way to combine the .basic and
.freestyle lines.

It also seems that many of these would not get much traffic.  For example I
personally could see .western and .scala sitting with very little traffic.  I
could be wrong here but it is just my perception.

> What do you think? -- Are two lists better than one?  I'm not sure that
> this...
> 
>   Adventurers         FreeStyle           Space
>   Aquazone            Model Team          Star Wars
>   Basic               Pirates             Technic
>   Belville            PRIMO               Town
>   Books               Promotional         Trains
>   Castle              Robotics            Underground
>   DACTA               Scala               Western
>   DUPLO               Service             ZNAP
>   Fabuland            Software
> 
>   Administrative      Dear LEGO           Marketplace
>   Announcements       FAQ                 Off-Topic
>   Building            General             Publishing
>   CAD                 LEGOLAND            Reviews
>   Database            Local               Storage
> 
> ...is really any clearer than this:
> 
>   Administrative      FAQ                 Robotics
>   Adventurers         Fabuland            Scala
>   Announcements       FreeStyle           Service
>   Aquazone            General             Software
>   Basic               LEGOLAND            Space
>   Belville            Local               Star Wars
>   Books               Marketplace         Storage
>   Building            Model Team          Technic
>   CAD                 Off-Topic           Town
>   Castle              PRIMO               Trains
>   DACTA               Pirates             Underground
>   DUPLO               Promotional         Western
>   Database            Publishing          ZNAP
>   Dear LEGO           Reviews


Two lists definitly seem better to me.

Eric

Remember to remove ".jawaspam" when replying by E-mail.

The New England Lego Users Group
http://www.nelug.org


> But I should wouldn't want to stuff much more into a list that big.  :)
> 
> --Todd



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: CFD: lugnet.lego.* newsgroup hierarchy
 
(...) Hmm. Well, there really are have been about 30 or 35 or so major categories over the past 30 or so years, right? So it may not grow much. In the past 10 years, for example, only about 10 major categories have been added: : 1989 - LEGO® SYSTEM™ (...) (27 years ago, 9-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: CFD: lugnet.lego.* newsgroup hierarchy
 
(...) When I said there were "two main possibilities," I really meant that there were only two apparently feasable possibilities. But there's actually a third feasable possibility -- it was right under my nose and I didn't see it! (...) Here's the (...) (27 years ago, 9-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

13 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR