 | | New lego history newsgroup?
|
|
I think that this has been requested before, but could there be a Lego history group? From time to time (like now) .general gets rather overwhelmed with history posts and not everyone is interested in every last tiny detail :-) It would also be a (...) (18 years ago, 31-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET is not sending out message authentication posts.
|
|
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:20061224034051....ron.com... (...) Done. Email headed your way (with headers) - please let me know if there's something besides LUGNET that is causing this, because if there is, I'd really like to (...) (18 years ago, 24-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET is not sending out message authentication posts.
|
|
(...) Could you forward me one of those auth messages (including headers)? I want to see if it was sent late or recieved late :) Especially since you say the messages are visible in the multiauth page, they would show up there only AFTER the email (...) (18 years ago, 24-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET is not sending out message authentication posts.
|
|
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:20061223155405....ron.com... (...) Well, it turns out that they are being generated quite late. Because I eventually received the authentication messages. Although, I have to say these were nearly (...) (18 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET is not sending out message authentication posts.
|
|
(...) Are you 100% sure that the emails aren't being blocked by something on your end? I post via email (though not that often, I know), and I haven't seen this problem? (18 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | LUGNET is not sending out message authentication posts.
|
|
Occasionally, this happens - I've no idea why though Could Rene or Gerry please look into this ASAP and find out what is causing an authentication message to not get sent out? I find that using the "multiauth" link in a previous post will usually (...) (18 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Password reset request for Ralph Hempel
|
|
Hi folks, With the new excitement around the NXT, and my increasing business travel, I would really like it if I could get my account set up so that I can post via the web interface. I was a fairly early member of Lugnet, and have been posting via (...) (18 years ago, 16-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A Question about Posting Behavior
|
|
(...) The only semi-tricky part would be to identify the 'XXX said' line - though, it's a safe assumption that if the line before a quoted region has exactly one sentance and ends with a ':', it's part of the quote. Probably miss a bunch of edge (...) (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A Question about Posting Behavior
|
|
(...) Well, there's a little more to it, actually. Basically, you need the code to figure out what's what. Since LUGNET was designed to work with SMTP and NNTP, the exact string "In lugnet.xxx.yyy, ZZZ wrote:" won't be consistant. Right now, the (...) (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Question about Posting Behavior
|
|
(...) Of course the "XXX said" could be kept the same but colour coded with the daughter colour. Tim (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Question about Posting Behavior
|
|
(...) Okay, I can understand that, but at least couldn't the colors match up without any loss in accuracy? JOHN (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Question about Posting Behavior
|
|
(...) Well, the reason is because "Sensible Person" didn't actually write the text "In lugnet.admin.general, Sensible Party wrote:", so it's not really something that they said. I believe it's the standard for old text email quotings and newsgroup (...) (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | A Question about Posting Behavior
|
|
I have had this question in my mind since Todd initiated the color-coding for responses in a thread: when someone replies to a post, why doesn't the number of arrows correspond to the text of the poster? For example, if someone named Sensible Party (...) (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Questions about the setup for mail-to-news on lugnet.com
|
|
This is still an ongoing issue for LUGNET and people who have to occasionally post to the lugnet.robotics hierarchy. However, some interesting questions about the gateway arise. For instance, I keep finding that my email address is specified as the (...) (18 years ago, 13-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Strange FTX behaviour
|
|
(...) Yup, that was it. Upgrade to the new version (0.8), it's fixed there. Oddity - for some reason my FF wasn't able to detect there's a new version when I did "find updates". If that happens to you too, let me know! As a workaround, I had to (...) (18 years ago, 4-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Strange FTX behaviour
|
|
(...) I'm pretty sure that's the peeron extension doing that. I'll have to figure out exactly what it's doing wrong, but probably need to tell it to ignore <code> blocks, or somesuch. (18 years ago, 4-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Strange FTX behaviour
|
|
On (URL) this page> in the guide. When I first load (or refresh) the page, everything seems to display fine, but when the page load nears completion, the top box (showing the code example for the 3 forestmen sets) contracts to show just the (...) (18 years ago, 4-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Is this group in the right place?
|
|
(...) In my own specific case, there is not even a street to mention, one way or another. Appearantly I'm not from somewhere that spans the globe..:-) Selçuk (18 years ago, 1-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Is this group in the right place?
|
|
(...) In that case there was a definite need for you to be provided with information, it was raised in the Ambassadors mailing list, there was some discussion amongst the Ambassadors, and, after consultation, LEGO allowed the information you (...) (18 years ago, 1-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Is this group in the right place?
|
|
(...) What do you mean 'count on them'? (...) I can't speak for others, but can tell you I liaised with LEGO Australia and the Brickvention organisers, including negotiating sponsorship by LEGO for Brickvention. (...) Well, I may not have been (...) (18 years ago, 1-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
