 | | Re: LEGOFan.org 2.0 is now online!
|
|
(...) Hmm, we could add related sites to lugnet.org (lugnet.org.legofan) or we could create a new hierarchy lugnet.site, so it would be lugnset.site.legofan. If we do that, it would at least give people a place for all the "what's wrong with (...) (19 years ago, 3-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: This is ridiculous
|
|
(...) For one, it is easier to sign up, read and follow threads. For old timers, it is also about opening up possibilities. At CSF and CC, what was just ".space" can be expanded into Space/General; Moonbase/Events; Space MOCs; Spacewerks/Inprocess; (...) (19 years ago, 3-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: This is ridiculous
|
|
"Terry Prosper" <terryprosper@videotron.ca> wrote in message news:IFtDGs.13qJ@lugnet.com... (...) vote (...) was cool, (...) Are there any statistics about the number of people who read LUGNET via NNTP versus via the web interface? I always read (...) (19 years ago, 3-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: This is ridiculous
|
|
"Dave Johann" <legomecha@adelphia.net> wrote in message news:IFu985.JpA@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) pirates (...) does can (...) resources (...) information. (...) [ ... snipped ... ] I don't believe trains has another forum. ILTCO has (...) (19 years ago, 3-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: This is ridiculous
|
|
(...) I'm in! Where's the new Bellville post to spotlight? (...) You said it, brother. Still, if this occurs during a late night hour, I take it as a compliment that I am reaching other nations because I know no other US LUGNETters keep the wacky (...) (19 years ago, 2-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: This is ridiculous
|
|
(...) Hey Terry, I actually don't think this is a software issue. At some point this weekend my "Scenes from Los Angeles" post was the number one post, and it had only 3 votes.* The current top post (Tony's great ship) has only 5 votes (one of them (...) (19 years ago, 2-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: This is ridiculous
|
|
(...) Actually, I've thought both of these are major contributing factors to LUGNET's continuing decline as a community hub. Members don't vote as often as they should partly because some don't use the web interface and I know of no other way to (...) (19 years ago, 2-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: This is ridiculous
|
|
(...) Maybe I'm way off-track here, but the proliferation of theme-oriented community websites is part of the problem to me. We had a much stronger castle and space community here a year ago, but thse themes, along with others, have moved to other (...) (19 years ago, 1-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: This is ridiculous
|
|
(...) Yeah, I saw that too. (...) Fat chance of that ever happening! When was the last time someone fixed anything in Lugnet's software? But I agree, the Top Stories thing is pretty messed up. I think it's probably a problem that could be fixed if (...) (19 years ago, 1-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | This is ridiculous
|
|
Hello I just saw 4 posts from the same person in the Top Stories, all posts were 5 hours old and had receive 0 or 1 human recommendation. They all talk about pneumatics, which usually interests only a small percentage of the AFOLs, not because it's (...) (19 years ago, 1-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: Peace
|
|
Thank you for posting that. e (19 years ago, 30-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Context: LUGNET is not a democracy
|
|
(...) Hello, I don't post much neither and been here a long time (#98)! But HUMMMM what a debate!!!! I would like to interject my point of vew about people and LUGNET. When I became a member and made a $100 contribution for LUGNET, it was because it (...) (19 years ago, 30-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Nice and peacefull
|
|
Aaah, the sound of sorting (not fighting over) Lego. :-) Highlighted for peace, relaxation... and building. (19 years ago, 30-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Thanks to Lar and crew!
|
|
Just wanted to give a shout-out to whomever is responsible for getting me back my posting ability. I've been unable to post since about the time of the server change some time ago, or maybe some other changes since then, but anyway, this past week (...) (19 years ago, 29-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Listen up.
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Suzanne Rich Green wrote: ] (...) I - L - O - S - T ;P Bruce (19 years ago, 29-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Nice and peacefull
|
|
(...) I sense a plot... Dave! (19 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Listen up.
|
|
Hmm. As I said the other day; things are not going well when personal attacks on admins are spotlighted…. so please don’t blame the messengers. The challenge should be for the admins to run this show in such a way that no "feedback" is required. (...) (19 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Listen up.
|
|
(...) I'm out. :) Chris (19 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Listen up.
|
|
(URL) Isn't that nice? Hey, I know! Let's -ALL- play a game, right here in AdminLand! (^^) It's called The Quiet Game. Whoever remains silent longest wins! No tickling is allowed. ..funny faces are okay. Let's begin. I'll go first. [Hopefully we (...) (19 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | Re: hi-ho
|
|
(...) I respectfully request this post be cancelled - it's about drugs and prostitution! ;) ROSCO FUT: .ot.fun... (19 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
