 | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) I'm not going to reply in detail (although there is stuff I agree with and stuff I disagree with...) Instead, I'm going to ask you how *you* would handle a particular post, as an exercise. (URL) a post that flogs. There is nothing in that post (...) (20 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —Chris Magno
|
| | | | | (...) Yes Larry it is EASY! I KNOW what ~I~ would do. walk away! ignore it. IF this is what you did, then good for you. if not...... (shrug) more of the same-ol' same-ol' i guess. The ToU and its enfocement should be more about the "spirit" then the (...) (20 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | The light touch (was Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) OK, to clarify, in your opinion, are you saying this particular clause of the ToU should not be enforced at all? Or just not in this particular case with respect to this particular post? If not at all, why not? It's really a hot button with (...) (20 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —Anders Isaksson
|
| | | | | (...) The question was not directed at me, but I can give *my* perception of the situation. "No-one bothered to comment in public on the offense" This means that other people, reading just the groups, not having insight into private e-mails, other (...) (20 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —Tony Alexander
|
| | | | | Quick note: I'm at work on lunch break, and can't give this the thought I want to word it as well as it should be... (...) Nobody's perfect, and everybody makes mistakes. I'm not sure if it constitues a TOU violation, as I'm not as well-versed in (...) (20 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —Mike Walsh
|
| | | | | | | "Tony Alexander" <tw0nst3r@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:IFIJDx.FMy@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) should (...) that (...) there (...) [ ... snipped ... ] Shouldn't Admin posting such as the one above be posted by "LUGNET Admin" as (...) (20 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | light touches (was Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Yes. If posting an official warning is the right level of touch, that is. I said that after Tony had a chance to answer, I'd say what the admins did, and my guess at why. I'm still hoping Chris will answer why he thinks nothing should be done, (...) (20 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —Tony Alexander
|
| | | | | | (...) Sorry to reply to my own post, but a few caveats (still at work, but thought of more and had a chance): * I'm a member/user, not an admin; as such, my immediate reply to seeing this post would have been: "Hmmm...not technic...on to the next (...) (20 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) (it's possible other circumstances might alter this slightly, like if it's been excessively long between offenses-- like-- years, or if the user consciously defies being told otherwise): 1) First time offender A) Someone (officially or not) (...) (20 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
