 | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
|
(...) I too had high hopes for the LPRC. Has it officially failed? (...) Well I guess there's several viewpoints on those reasons too, but I would be interested in what (in your opinion) caused it to fail. ROSCO (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Legends of Todd
|
|
(...) In my opinion, no, especially if the implementation directly affect those whould would discuss it. For example: The club you belong to forms a committee to review the dress code. It just so happens (by coincidenece) that everyone on the (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
|
(...) No personal offense intended - have you ever run a large community forum, or managed people? There is a big difference in how people think things should be run when they have actually had to run things. (...) I think that the LPRV Committee (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET members association
|
|
(...) I too see this as unnecessary - there is still no requirement for the administration to act on any recommendations of the LMA, in effect they can say, as they have already done several times now, "We have made the decision and will not respond (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Legends of Todd
|
|
(...) Not if the policy being implemented has the effect of inhibiting discussion or making that discussion irrelevant. Marc Nelson Jr. (URL) Marc's Creations>> (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET members association
|
|
(...) I'm not sure how this would operate differently than what we have now. Members can all make suggestions to the admin.suggestions, and the Admins read them all. Right now implementation of suggestions is a bit difficult due to needed code (...) (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Legends of Todd
|
|
(...) Isn't it possible for people to discuss something even if it is currently being implemented? Or is it the point that something should be submitted to the community before implementation just for the sake of it? In which case, does the (...) (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET members association
|
|
(...) Rob, I like this idea very much. I'd be happy to become a member. Kevin (...) (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Another resignation: I'm stepping down.
|
|
(...) I would say that I was never "out of control" - especially since just about everything I've done, I've had the support of the other Admins. But then, we're getting into the semantics of "out of control." (...) My message was due to (...) (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Legends of Todd
|
|
(...) I posted this already but this is not the impression that I got from the announcement post or various other conversions with those involved. The impression I got was that the committee was going to generate the P&P and then it would be (...) (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: P&P document
|
|
(...) Thans for the cancel Kelly. (...) I was in a rush because I had to catch a plane very early this morning. I used your work address kelly@anagraphyxx.com. I realized I had made a bad choice, this the request for cancel. I'm sorry if you didn't (...) (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: P&P document
|
|
(...) Hello Kevin, I didn't seem to receive that email, I'll check my settings to make sure it didn't get routed inappropriately. I've just cancelled the post per request. For my records, which email address did you send it to? kelly@anagrafyxx.com (...) (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
|
(...) I don't know about all of this. People keep talking about transparency and how great it all is, but exactly what do you want to see? Do you want the Admin emails to be public? Do you want to see every draft of public pronouncements? To use the (...) (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: P&P document
|
|
(...) This morning I sent you an email asking you to cancel my post where I made the P&P visible. I'll ask again to please cancel my post. Kevin (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Legends of Todd
|
|
(...) An excellent post, Dave. A few things I want to touch on - the Admins' basic idea of how the P&P process would work is essentially what you described here. We write it, work on it. Share it with a few people and get their input, get the (...) (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: P&P document
|
|
Yep. Read it. Please see my reply here : (...) (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
|
You mentioned the efficiency of a tiered review process as a reason for not making everything about lugnet administration public. I don't buy that. I submit that efficency is irrelavent to the problem at hand and I beleive that recent events clearly (...) (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
|
(...) LUGNET historians might remember the flurry of posts about CP and cp--community policing. It was all in the open and we all chimed in and we all hashed it out (at least those of us who felt strongly about it) (...) Again, perception, even if (...) (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | LUGNET members association
|
|
I move to form a new organization (not led by myself), that consists of members (if you aren't a member of LUGNET, what's the holdup?) of the LUGNET community. The association would govern the majority of the members needs, desires, problems, (...) (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions) !
|
| |
| | Re: P&P document
|
|
(...) Unfortunately, it's an option, albeit one that I don't think anyone likes. There have been many posts recently about lack of trust in the administration of LUGNET, with some justification. But it works both ways. Admins need to be able to (...) (19 years ago, 21-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
