 | | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs" —Ken Nagel
|
| | | (...) There is no clause that say’s it’s ok to divulge personal information if you didn’t know the person did not want it divulged. In fact it say’s exactly the opposite. If you don’t specifically have permission it is wrong. Friends could perhaps (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs" —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) That is true. (...) I don't think that it explicitly says the opposite, but regardless, you have a point. On the other hand, if Larry divulged personal information about you without knowing that it was private, do you think it is accurate to (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs" —Ken Nagel
|
| | | | | | (...) The attacking part came with the messing it up part it's an other issue. (...) What happend within a smaller group is not an invitation to take it public. (...) No I feel fired. Ken (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs" —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Can we talk a little bit more about the messing it up issue? Do you think Larry was attacking you personally or NILTC as a whole by replying to the NILTC invitation? He has said since that his intention was not to attack you or anyone, but (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs" —Mike Walsh
|
| | | | | | "Todd Lehman" <tsl@tsl.bu.edu> wrote in message news:IArA5u.DqD@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] I too have been catching up, I was out of town for a week with minimal connectivity. Boy, what a mess to come back to. (...) I would be shocked if Ken (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs" —Ken Nagel
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.admin.general, Mike Walsh wrote (...) So as I mentioned to Todd I can now post anything I want because if I'm able to find it out it can't be an invasion of privacy.-Ken (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs" —Mike Walsh
|
| | | | | | "Ken Nagel" <knandjn@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:IAt0LL.1AKF@lugnet.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] (...) able to (...) It's a gray area for sure and like just about anything which is gray, you can find a corner case which doesn't fit the (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs" —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I'm not sure it's a given. What consequences do you feel are directly attributable to my actions? Please be specific by giving the specific action I took, and the consequence that directly followed? (...) I'm not sure you've demonstrated that. (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs" —Ken Nagel
|
| | | | (...) If you missed them go back and re-read the previous postings. (...) It's pathetic that you can carry on with this and feel you have any credibility as a Lugnet administrator. -Ken (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs" —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Do me a favour and explain it again for me, because I have read the previous postings, and I didn't see what the specific consequences of this asserted privacy violation were. We're going really slowly here to make sure that there is no (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs" —Ken Nagel
|
| | | | (...) Again the facts have been posted multible times It's a waste of time to repost them. (...) Apparently there is nothing that can help. The facts have been laid out several times. All you want to do is obfuscate the facts and parse the words. (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
