 | | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) Dude, these statistics are whacked. There's no way I posted 177 messages in 2004, since I only crawled back to LUGNET part way through 2004, and don't post often. How are these stats generated? KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203 (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) w00t, moved up the list a bit (a lot) I'd be by the highest UK AFO if it wasn't for Scott Aurther and his OT posts! (next is Mark Bellis with 183) Thanks for doung that dan Tim PS Do you realise that as Amando Pin only seems to post to anounce (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | posting privileges to 1000steine-members revoked!?
|
|
Larry, I have a real lack of understanding for your behaviour to revoke posting privileges to people who only quoted "bad words" to keep the context, while the original post with those "bad words" is still public and even highlighted. You know that (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) Woo hoo! I beat Lenny by 2! Take that, Kracky! (Shakes fist at Calum) Dang you, Calum, with your wry Canadian wit, I'll get you next year. (...) I did a bit of digging: (URL) top noisemakers of 2000> (URL) top noisemakers of 2001> (URL) top (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
|
|
(...) I know which ones you mean too. But I'll say that I personally don't like the milder ones either, I think they show lack of imagination. I am in the minority on the Admin team, so A-- gets a pass and B---- seems to fit the sitch, and S--- gets (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) More of a time issue - only wanted to spend a few minutes on it, and writing code that decides if two different email addresses are actually the same person was not worth the effort, imo. And in this particular case, my opinion was the one (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) c/is still the loudest mouth/still seems to have the most to say/ Tis possible to post less and still be a bigger loudmouth. This could be an E2L thing I guess. (...) Sounds like a coding problem on your end. :) (...) Was this posted there (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) 483rd :-( From top 100 to 483rd in two years. Mostly because I'm too busy these days. Must get back into it. (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) You could say he "schooled" you [1] (...) Here is exactly what I was talking about elsewhere-- we have Daves talking about Daves. It's too much for the sensibilities:-) JOHN FU to .people; I venture not into .OT [1] Schule in German = school (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) <snip> Schuler beat me????? That vote was definitley rigged! I demand a recount! Let's get some Ohio and Florida vote counting officials in here!!! Thanks for this, Dan Dave K (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
In lugnet.people, Dan Boger wrote: <snip> (...) Far too many "Daves" in the top 6 for my taste>;^D Thanks, Dan! JOHN (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | 2004 posting statistics (was Re: Posting statistics)
|
|
(...) I don't remember if I did this for last year, but here's this year's. If there's interest, I can post last year's as well. Same limitations as before, deal with it :) Notice that Larry is still the loudest mouth, excep that he posted from 4 (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: stepping up to the dead horse (was some other title)
|
|
(...) I think having a public record of timeouts is important - not only it allows the users (that you guys are serving, right?) keep an eye on how well you're doing your job, but it also shows that _something_ is getting done, and can be used to (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Updating the LUG map?
|
|
(...) I had taken it as a part of the Content Coord. position, but since there is the code freeze, theres not much point in devoting a lot of time to it. I haven't quite figured how to best do the same sort of LUG map without making it a colossal (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A concern voiced publicly
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Tom McDonald wrote: (snip) (...) I am also aware of this (URL), which was posted while I was taking too much time refining my first post :-) -Tom McD. (URL) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | A concern voiced publicly
|
|
Hello. I don't usually post to this group, as I don't find it necessary. Others often voice my concerns more eloquently and cogently. But perhaps this time, Lugnet Admins can help me understand. Today, I read this post: (URL) in which 7 other groups (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Website Security Certificate
|
|
(...) You might want to check the time and *date* on your computer. One of my computers has a bad pram battery in it. Anytime I do a cold shut down, I have to resync to the apple net time server when I start it up. If I forget, lugnet reminds me (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) I would like to applaud Larry for his well reasoned approach to the *ahem* situation. Now I would like to make a part-humorous, part-serious, suggestion... Perhaps we have arrived at the point where lugnet.color needs to be subdivided ? My (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Updating the LUG map?
|
|
(...) Some digging with a good search string will be needed to determine exactly what was said and by whom, but my understanding is that the LUGNET mapsets are not being updated. I think it is in part an issue that the people that were doing it got (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
