 | | Re: I am getting sick of this ...
|
|
(...) Yes, it does. The most relevant matches are listed first -- for each part, the keywords that matched are listed in red. (...) I don't think that part is in Partsref yet. (...) When I did this search, the first part listed was the only part (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | I am getting sick of this ...
|
|
Whenever I go to search for a part in partsref, it never sorts the matches by most relevant/least relevant etc. It just lists them in whatever order it finds them. E.G. Brick 1 x 4 with side studs as used in a space airlock door MOC recently. I (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: why no ".dat" email digests?...
|
|
(...) Todd and/or Suz, If this is so --(Is it?)-- then I'd like to have a feature added to the email subscriptions page, whereby I can _choose_ to subscribe to a group _and_ all of its subgroups as one digest... Please? Thanks, Franklin (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Suz Q&A was:[Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?]
|
|
(...) Why are all these kinds posts in lugnet.lego.direct? Does anyone expect Lego Direct to comment here? (or in similar posts). Of the groups that I follow, and I only follow a few (.trains, .trains.org, .cad.mlcad, and .cad.dev.mac), this is one (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: why no ".dat" email digests?...
|
|
(...) (not Suz or Todd, but...) Steve has the right of it. I'm e-mail subscribed to loc.ca, but I do not see any messages in any of the various loc.ca.foo groups. This is IMO, a good thing. thanks, James (22 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: why no ".dat" email digests?...
|
|
(...) That's weird, I was thinking it's the exact _opposite_. (In fact, I've arranged my subscriptions based on this premise, that I need only the upper-level groups, that the lower-level groups will be included...) Suz, Todd, which way is correct? (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | message authentication
|
|
Hi! After posting several messages recently, it became obvious to me that the "dreaded authentication process" was actually quite painless. Simple. Easy, in fact. The (relatively) new system with a web link in the authentication email really (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: why no ".dat" email digests?...
|
|
(...) Because 'lugnet.cad.dat' is retired, inactive, no-longer-in-existence. Unless I misunderstand news-by-mail, you only get messages for groups you specifically subscribe to, not all the subgroups under the specific groups. Steve (22 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | subscription page won't remember my confirmation code...
|
|
I'm a member of LUGNet ("(URL) I'm usually "signed in" on my parent's PC (i.e., LUGNet remembers my member ID and password). And yet, LUGNet does _not_ remember my "confirmation code" on the "Subscriptions" page ("(URL) (22 years ago, 23-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | why no ".dat" email digests?...
|
|
I've tried getting "lugnet.cad.dat" via email (digest) on the "Subscriptions" page ("(URL) I've _never_ gotten any messages for ".dat"... Why? Thanks, Franklin (22 years ago, 23-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Discount code clarification and update
|
|
(...) Oh, I agree, this is really a reason. Thank you very much for the explanation, Todd! Have a nice weekend, René (22 years ago, 21-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Replying to posts
|
|
To whom it may concern, My name is Tim Rice and whenever I reply to a lugnet post from my home computer using Juno as an e-mail service, the reply starts a whole new thread. Evidence of this can be found by searching for "hi here" a thread series (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Discount code clarification and update
|
|
(...) René, I think I understand where you're coming from, and how on the surface it might seem a bit ungracious of us to contact TLC about the coupon code. I'll share some more thoughts: I wouldn't say it's a "bad" thing per se that the string (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Discount code clarification and update
|
|
(...) Oh. I thought this would be a "site by fans, for fans" as announced at the homepage. Where the users are making the content. (...) If this is your view, everone has to tolerate it, but please do tolerate other views and also speculations too. (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: patience please
|
|
(...) [...] (...) Thank you for posting this! The absense of messages like this is exactly what people meant whey they said "sitting on your hands". If it isn't obvious that you're doing anything, there is a certain temptation to assume that you're (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | patience please
|
|
Hi all, I'm feeling a bit overwhelmed by the amount of stuff I really want to reply to here.. - Right now I'm writing a summary of my opinions on the posting privileges issue, because I see people making false assumptions. I'd also like to set up a (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Biggest Thread on Lugnet?
|
|
Hi all! I have a question. Does anyone know how to access the biggest threads in post count on lugnet? I have noticed through my time on Lugnet that some really large threads developed in a matter of days on some very interesting and thought (...) (22 years ago, 17-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Terms of Use violation (was Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?)
|
|
"LUGNET Admin" <suz@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:GxrFKF.D3p@lugnet.com... (...) be (...) a (...) Just don't forget Suz your only human. (mini-fig) -- Thanx~ Nicole (URL) (22 years ago, 15-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Terms of Use violation (was Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?)
|
|
(...) yup. I screwed up. -Suz (22 years ago, 15-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Terms of Use violation (was Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?)
|
|
(...) Actually Bill Ward is right... as an admin, Suz needs to lead by example. What she posted earlier today was in my opinion very shocking and inappropriate. I have to also look at her flaming policy as of late and "judge her by her own words"... (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
