 | | Re: a question...
|
|
(...) Mmm, This is my current preference. I think it conveys its good intent and is accurate without being too specific. (...) Ahhhh, it gives me little shivers.... (...) Ooooooo, it's like a cool breeze across my sweat-beaded brow.... :-) (...) You (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | thx suz
|
|
(...) oh ja! much much better (...) ok (...) ja, systems have inertia and need periodic infusions of new energies, ideas, etc. and THAT'S what I was hoping to see here, and of course, it werked. much thx for the roundtables :-) -paul (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | vineyards of equality (was Re: a question...)
|
|
(...) I was also encouraged with a good deal of what Suzanne had to say - although I did also have some respect for what Paul was trying to say. If we agree that a round-table is a discussion (or meeting) where people talk in conditions of equality, (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a question...
|
|
(...) An excellent idea. How about lugnet.round-table.* Some possible round table groups: - .new-groups A place to discuss ideas for new newsgroups. True, this discussion currently happens in .admin.general or .admin.nntp, but with a round table (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a question...
|
|
(...) Me too! ;) If I can set up a scenario An issue gets bumped into .general.admin If it's going to take a while to resolve, bump it to .roundtable Carrying out discussions to resolve issues that may arise and get these out of LUGNET.general.admin (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a question...
|
|
(...) lugnet.admin.roundtable ?? (it was the obvious choice and it lets me get a "I agree" in on the rest of what you said without it being purely a metoo post...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a question...
|
|
(...) preferred participating in LUGNET forums to the r.t.l. Usenet group, and many still do. (...) I'm not sure if your questioning is meant as a scientific poll or a hope to start another 50+message-long mud-puddle, but uh... either way, I'd (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET's Good Health was: [Re: Lugnet's tailspin]
|
|
Thanks for your comments Suz. :-) LUGNET Admin <suz@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:Gstwn2.3xw@lugnet.com... (...) agree (...) OK coming through LOUD and clear :-)) And I would just like to say I LOVE LUGNET as well. Although as a co-creator your (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | a question...
|
|
"It is believed that there are large numbers of LEGO enthusiasts on the Internet who currently know about RTL but avoid it because they feel it has become too big, too hostile, too political, too commercial, or too ethnocentric. The LUGNET message (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET's Good Health was: [Re: Lugnet's tailspin]
|
|
(...) Perhaps tailspin was too strong a word. I do perceive a trend, but I also see your energy picking up which is extremely good news. (...) There is probably not much need to mull over the past. I think we all agree that there has been an effect (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
