 | | Re: Criticism of LUGNET's homepage (was: Re: newsticker)
|
|
(...) I think this link should not go, but be changed into an events calendar, links to large events sites (BrickFest in DC, BricksWest in CA, the big rtlToronto events, LEGOWORLD in the Netherlands, etc), and links to event pictures. Possible (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Profile - Inputing websites?
|
|
Dan & All, (...) I tried to do (URL) and then www.michlug.org and then michlug.org but (URL) works. Heh. Thanks Dan! They are working within specified parameters now. : ) Scott S. -- (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: ?
|
|
(...) As most of us know, this has happened before. Although I do not expect this link will be a long-term problem, I wonder if it is possible for admins to provide a warning page between future problem links and the pages concerned – assuming that (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: ? ... (Shooting the messenger)
|
|
For the Record: (...) [snip] (...) I agree. and that goes for -any- group, not just general. -Suz (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Profile - Inputing websites?
|
|
(...) did you put in your sites as "michlug.org" or "(URL) Try it, I think it'll solve this problem. :) Dan (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Profile - Inputing websites?
|
|
To Whom IT May Concern, I am trying to clean up my profile on the people side of LUGNET, and I am trying to update my website information. It seems to point to www.lugnet.com/people and then the website I inputed. Is this a glitch or something, or (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: ? ... Shooting the messenger as he walks away in the huff ;)
|
|
(...) Richard, Don't get uptight. Just learn from your error and move on. Scott A (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Totally inappropriate pic link given with no warning whatever.
|
|
...and you, and others, include the link in your replies in .general. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | ? ... (Shooting the messenger)
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) I did what I could to make a bad situation better. I didn't know what else to do but knew that resolution was needed. I just wanted to find help, and didn't know how else to do it. Seemed like the best "common sense" at that (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Totally inappropriate pic link given with no warning whatever.
|
|
(...) Yes, why indeed... I would posit that you would have served the entire community a lot better by dropping a note to Kevin about this pic instead of posting a link to it to ***.GENERAL***, for goodness sake, with nary a word of warning that (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Special sub group for the Bricks-Only brigade?
|
|
(...) Good idea. I suggest "lugnet.whine" for that. --Bill. XFUT: lugnet.admin.nntp (23 years ago, 19-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Joules' alias (was: Re: Won't you give me one more try?)
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Todd, Thanks for the explanation and quick fix. -Duane (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Joules' alias (was: Re: Won't you give me one more try?)
|
|
(...) Scott, Duane -- Thanks for the links and history... Yes, this is fairly easy to rectify. Some wires got crossed in the userinfo database (due to human error, my fault, sometime last August and not noticed until recently). Once in a blue moon, (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mails due to Lugnet inventories
|
|
(...) If it does not have an link to some site selling things or an offer it can't be traditional spam so I'd e-mail him back and ask. Sounds like a big misunderstanding, probably due to lack of language skills. /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possibility of lugnet.db.inv.discussion?
|
|
Todd and I are talking about it now. More later.. -Suz (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Special sub group for the Bricks-Only brigade?
|
|
Can there be a group devoted to the doomsday scenario discussions? Every time a new set comes out (or is spotted in a fuzzy photograph) there is a hue and cry that follows the form: "There is an insufficient number of (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mails due to Lugnet inventories
|
|
<snipped> (...) I've gotten wacky emails that are out of touch with reality before. My response is simply to ignore them. Delete, move on. Don't answer, because if they're spoofed headers, they may be checking to see if you're "live." An archival (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | E-mails due to Lugnet inventories
|
|
In the past 24 hours I have received three e-mails from a Michael Chiaravalloti (theoliver50@hotmail.com) requesting that I send him, free of charge, several pieces from sets I have inventoried and posted to lugnet.db.inv. I am not entirely sure how (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possibility of lugnet.db.inv.discussion?
|
|
Was there ever any decision on this issue? We now have a number of threads about a tool to create inventories in lugnet.db.inv. This may technically violate the charter for that group, but there doesn't seem to be any more appropriate place to post (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Joules' alias (was: Re: Won't you give me one more try?)
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Allan Bedford writes: [...] (...) I don't see an urgency to discuss the policy. (...) I didn't catch it. That's the only reason it went on. I certainly would have minded, the same as I do right now. Please don't equate (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
