 | | Profile - Inputing websites?
|
|
To Whom IT May Concern, I am trying to clean up my profile on the people side of LUGNET, and I am trying to update my website information. It seems to point to www.lugnet.com/people and then the website I inputed. Is this a glitch or something, or (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: ? ... Shooting the messenger as he walks away in the huff ;)
|
|
(...) Richard, Don't get uptight. Just learn from your error and move on. Scott A (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Totally inappropriate pic link given with no warning whatever.
|
|
...and you, and others, include the link in your replies in .general. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | ? ... (Shooting the messenger)
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) I did what I could to make a bad situation better. I didn't know what else to do but knew that resolution was needed. I just wanted to find help, and didn't know how else to do it. Seemed like the best "common sense" at that (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Totally inappropriate pic link given with no warning whatever.
|
|
(...) Yes, why indeed... I would posit that you would have served the entire community a lot better by dropping a note to Kevin about this pic instead of posting a link to it to ***.GENERAL***, for goodness sake, with nary a word of warning that (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Special sub group for the Bricks-Only brigade?
|
|
(...) Good idea. I suggest "lugnet.whine" for that. --Bill. XFUT: lugnet.admin.nntp (23 years ago, 19-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Joules' alias (was: Re: Won't you give me one more try?)
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Todd, Thanks for the explanation and quick fix. -Duane (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Joules' alias (was: Re: Won't you give me one more try?)
|
|
(...) Scott, Duane -- Thanks for the links and history... Yes, this is fairly easy to rectify. Some wires got crossed in the userinfo database (due to human error, my fault, sometime last August and not noticed until recently). Once in a blue moon, (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mails due to Lugnet inventories
|
|
(...) If it does not have an link to some site selling things or an offer it can't be traditional spam so I'd e-mail him back and ask. Sounds like a big misunderstanding, probably due to lack of language skills. /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possibility of lugnet.db.inv.discussion?
|
|
Todd and I are talking about it now. More later.. -Suz (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Special sub group for the Bricks-Only brigade?
|
|
Can there be a group devoted to the doomsday scenario discussions? Every time a new set comes out (or is spotted in a fuzzy photograph) there is a hue and cry that follows the form: "There is an insufficient number of (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mails due to Lugnet inventories
|
|
<snipped> (...) I've gotten wacky emails that are out of touch with reality before. My response is simply to ignore them. Delete, move on. Don't answer, because if they're spoofed headers, they may be checking to see if you're "live." An archival (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | E-mails due to Lugnet inventories
|
|
In the past 24 hours I have received three e-mails from a Michael Chiaravalloti (theoliver50@hotmail.com) requesting that I send him, free of charge, several pieces from sets I have inventoried and posted to lugnet.db.inv. I am not entirely sure how (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Possibility of lugnet.db.inv.discussion?
|
|
Was there ever any decision on this issue? We now have a number of threads about a tool to create inventories in lugnet.db.inv. This may technically violate the charter for that group, but there doesn't seem to be any more appropriate place to post (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Joules' alias (was: Re: Won't you give me one more try?)
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Allan Bedford writes: [...] (...) I don't see an urgency to discuss the policy. (...) I didn't catch it. That's the only reason it went on. I certainly would have minded, the same as I do right now. Please don't equate (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Joules' alias (was: Re: Won't you give me one more try?)
|
|
Hi Richard! (...) To be frank (err, to be Shiri)... Aww, c'mon, gimme a break. Honestly, Richard; the one thing that makes lugnet so special and friendly and personal is the use of our real life names; the knowledge that people are here with honest (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Joules' alias (was: Re: Won't you give me one more try?)
|
|
(...) now there is little doubt. ;) Now that we know that he is breaking the ToS, we have to consider if it is worth bothering about (I can’t say I care). Given that he has two accounts here (one with his apparent real name and the other with his (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Joules' alias (was: Re: Won't you give me one more try?)
|
|
Dosent this mean that is real name is clearly understood. He has given it out freely on Lugnet, and therefore under the TOS is allowed to post using an alias Excerpt of the relevant section: unless your real name and identity is clearly understood, (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Joules' alias (was: Re: Won't you give me one more try?)
|
|
(...) I noticed this as well. In the thread based on his original (first time to LUGNET) posting, it was pointed out to him the problem about a screen name vs. a real name. He dealt with it quickly and graciously. His real name, for all intents and (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Joules' alias (was: Re: Won't you give me one more try?)
|
|
(...) From this post, I think it is evident that it is indeed a pseudomyn (URL) more, he was told to post using his real name, changed and has reverted to the pseudonym. Definitely worth noting. -Duane (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
