 | | Re: I'm sorry
|
| "Mark Sandlin" <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:B6E42A60.F471%s...ink.com... (...) slowly (...) the (...) Well, you had me fooled - I even posted a "sorry to see you go" reply :| Glad to hear your it was just your body clock that was a (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Calling it Quits
|
| "Rose Regner" <lego@r2eng.com> wrote in message news:GAu85v.5Bz@lugnet.com... (...) stand (...) up (...) it (...) Ok. (...) Well, I can say with a clear conscience that I did not intend that message to be harsh, my attitude in posting it was not (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Calling it Quits
|
| (...) If I jump into a flaming post, and someone jumps on me I am kind of expecting that not everyone is going to be kind. On the other hand if I am empathizing with someone or having a genuine Lego discussion with someone and I get flamed out of no (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Calling it Quits
|
| (...) I just wanted to add my two cents-- a) I thought this was pretty funny. b) I agree with all those who point out that the problem is not with the initial joke, but with people jumping on each other in the aftermath c) I don't think that this (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Calling it Quits
|
| So, I suppose I should shelve my plans for a "Gun-weilding teen blames LEGOWars" announcement? -gyug (geeez, just kidding!) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Calling it Quits
|
| Stripped out .off-topic.fun because this isn't! (...) Obviously some have taken offense to my use of the word "Sucker" and I would like to explain that I don't find the word insulting. Last year when Ben did his April Fool's train post I got (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Calling it Quits
|
| (...) Since my name continues to reappear, I'll reiterate: I know this thread is long over, and it would probably be best to simply leave it alone, but something needs to be clarified. I don’t believe that anybody was really offended by the joke. (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Calling it Quits
|
| (...) Being a week early made me think it was real. (...) I agree. (...) I agree again. Has foot in mouth reached the states already? Posting the message in the Top Stories was the main reason I thought it was for real. (I missed the downward (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Calling it Quits
|
| (...) <snipped> (...) Amen, brutha! :) Dan (25 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Calling it Quits
|
| (...) And I strongly feel that this media lends itself to people acting in a manner they normally wouldn't in a face-to-face, real life situation (flaming. etc). Since computers create a safe distance, people start acting like they can say anything. (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
