 | | Fix for a broken link
|
|
Todd, In the (URL) page their is a link to Matt's Track Designer. The link to this was changed when I took over the hosting of The Train Depot. The new link is (URL) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) For us AFOLs, it was an incredibly nice thing to do. And for LD, it's a nice way to gather a data point on our buying power. It's a win-win. But... (...) Actually, it doesn't really belong in the main .announce group -- it was an unsolicited (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) Sounds like you're the one who needs to relax. Read Mark's post... probably better than I could write in reply to you. Dude, chill out, the inflammatory nature of your messages telling people to relax is pretty durn hypocritical. -Tim (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) There are specific guidelines set up on the newsgroups to keep things orderly. If people posted anywhere they liked, things would get rather messy and confusing. When I was a newbie, I posted an auction announcement to .space, and people (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) Why not?? I mean true, it is not for trade - but it is for SALE and you can BUY it - right? I think sometimes you people have lost sight of the forest, AND are missing the trees while you are at it. R-E-L-A-X !!!! (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
All in all, what does it really matter???? I mean, they made a SPECIAL effort to offer these sets to US FIRST - they could have easily ignored us alltogether, but no - They gave us first shot. I would definitely say this belongs in all of the (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd, can you explain the search function again?
|
|
(...) I should say can't always; the first reply was just after a meeting and just before lunch -- happened to check in and see it just after you posted it. (...) Ah, neat...it worked. I love Forte Free Agent! And it's really nice on my Crusoe (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd, can you explain the search function again?
|
|
(...) other rather than as separate "words," ya? My parser doesn't expect the < and the > to occur in the same word. I'll need to fix that before you can put them so close together. If you type <10 >10 (note the space character between the "0" and (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Block List?
|
|
"Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:G8nrIv.KFs@lugnet.com... (...) Make that two annoying (and this second one incredibly rude and arrogant) posters. -Tim (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd, can you explain the search function again?
|
|
(...) (URL)There's also this, which isn't linked in yet: (...) I know the previous search was suspected of causing you system-wide problems but the cool thing about it was being able to search for posts made by particular individuals and getting (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
