 | | Re: FTX example source
|
|
(...) Not as one page, but you can get at the raw FTX code by appending '.ftx'[1] to the end of each page and looking at them one by one, for example: (3 URLs) etc. --Todd [1] or using index.ftx in the case of a trailing slash (26 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | FTX example source
|
|
Would it be possible to publish the FTX source to (URL) (which really means the source to all of the components, not just the transclusion source)? It's a pretty good guide, but a few things that appear doable don't appear to be written up anywhere. (...) (26 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: advanced search options?
|
|
(...) Here's the best answer I can give for now: (URL) How do I tell the search function to return only those posts (...) There isn't a way to search that way. These aren't captured by the current indexer. --Todd (26 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
|
(...) Benjamin may not have control over what mailer his employer uses, but he certainly has control over whether or not his messages appear threaded. If he posts using software that works correctly, his messages will appear threaded. If he posts (...) (26 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Incorrect group posting [was RE: cartoonnetwork.com is having an online contest]
|
|
Now hold up a sec! Whilst I agree with Todd, berating Benjamin over something he has no control over won't actually accomplish anything. He has stated, previously, that he has no control over what the server admins do on their machines, and I (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: hackin the faq
|
|
And as the Oops page notes, I really meant: (URL) Clark" <cary@corp.nospamwebtv.net> wrote in message news:G28Jsz.BFu@lugnet.com... (...) question, (...) The (...) on (...) for (...) is (...) made (...) transclusion[3] (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | hackin the faq
|
|
I've spent a few moments paying around with the LUGNET FAQ in FTX. Starting with (URL) (the batch that Jeremy Sproat created some time ago) I've put a whopping total of three of them here: (URL) tried to preserve the original FAQ entries content, (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Incorrect group posting [was RE: cartoonnetwork.com is having an online contest]
|
|
(...) Hear Hear. I suggest Ben be banned from complaining about ANYTHING directly related to Lugnet (don't worry Ben, you can still whinge about how Aussies pay more for stuff and all that, lots left to whinge about...) until he uses the proper (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Cross reference in Set Guide
|
|
Todd, Would it be possible to add a cross reference in the set guide for sets with multiple set numbers such as the Galaxy Explorer <set:928> and <set:497>? Perhaps even just a link in the description of the set when it indicates it is the same as (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Any need for a UK buy, sell, trade group?
|
|
(...) I think todd will say that any market group will have to stay in the .market area. At least I think that was his preference when themed market groups were in the agenda. Scott A (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | How do we ask for a new newsgroup to be set up?
|
|
Or is this post sufficient? Several of us here in the UK would like a UK specific buy-sell-trade group. The current market group is international and we would like to separate out our buy-sell-trades when we want to only deal within the UK. So our (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Incorrect group posting [was RE: cartoonnetwork.com is having an online contest]
|
|
(...) or use the web interface from work? :) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Incorrect group posting [was RE: cartoonnetwork.com is having an online contest]
|
|
(...) No hard feelings here at all. I didn't take it personally. Mis use of .general was an issue for you, and my post was the one that seemed to have lit the spark to let Todd know your feelings. And he agreed with you. I learned a little something (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Incorrect group posting [was RE: cartoonnetwork.com is having an online contest]
|
|
(...) Umm, wouldn't that be lugnet.market.spam.s...m.spam.... FUT lugnet.off-topic.fun Frank (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Incorrect group posting [was RE: cartoonnetwork.com is having an online contest]
|
|
(...) Hmm, now that's an interesting hypothetical post. By current rules, it would seem that such a post should not be placed outside of lugnet.market.auction or lugnet.org.au (currently the only two groups I'm aware of which specifically welcome (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Incorrect group posting [was RE: cartoonnetwork.com is having an online contest]
|
|
(...) I still think this is a great idea. I would put them under .year.#### though. --Todd (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Incorrect group posting [was RE: cartoonnetwork.com is having an online contest]
|
|
(...) .market.spam comes to mind. :-) --Todd (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Incorrect group posting [was RE: cartoonnetwork.com is having an online contest]
|
|
(...) That sounds like the definition for lugnet.announce (which does indeed force you to set followups). My impression is that lugnet.general is for discussions which don't have a better newsgroup (or set of newsgroups) to be discussed in. I think (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | RE: Incorrect group posting [was RE: cartoonnetwork.com is having an online contest]
|
|
(...) As I can't thread from work [I was using a seperate PC earlier, which is why the earlier messages threaded] I hope you do read this... I'm sorry you thought I was trying to flame you. The reason my message was probably harsher than it should (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Incorrect group posting [was RE: cartoonnetwork.com is having an online contest]
|
|
(...) Julie, That sounds perfectly logical to me. If a local group is more appropriate due to the fact that something is localized, then the discussion should migrate there, ya (always to the most appropriate group). And Ben, You need to fix or (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us, lugnet.admin.general)
|
