 | | Announcing new LUGNET homepage
|
|
We are pleased to announce a new LUGNET homepage: (URL) hope that you find it refreshing and that new visitors will find it friendly and inviting. If you miss the old homepage, simply look for it at its new location: (URL) thanks to everyone who (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | Delete message?
|
|
Ii apologize if I am doing the wrong thing by posting this here, but could this message be deleted? (URL) from me, and I decided to change the message a bit after I hit the submit button. I hit STOP, but it loaded anyways. Again, I apologize for (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
"Michael Perri" <zerog270@aol.com> wrote in message news:FzBK0r.462@lugnet.com... (...) to (...) read (...) they (...) please (...) tough (...) they (...) racial (...) about (...) what (...) I've noticed, and so has everyone else I've spoken with, (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | defining proper content
|
|
I am very new to this part of lugnet but I have found a small problem that has received my attention. Anytime I know someone that has found a problem all that I will ask is give a possible solution with it. I wonder if this might be one of those (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) OK, that makes sense. It's only accessing one server there once the image is cached, and then it gives you a large image file. (...) That's totally bizarre too. Another redirection script on a completely different site, presumably doing (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) the first time it was this fast. Multiple times didn't improve the speed at all. (...) the delay. I didn't get a delay with mimg.cgi, (the first link) though. By the way, how did you get those long urls to not split across lines? -- David (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) I think it's specifically the multiple ":" characters. RFC 1738 mentions ":" as a reserved character -- that is, when it occurs in the scheme-specific part of a URL (URLs being <scheme>:<scheme-spe...fic-part>, of course) it should *only* be (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) A-HA! OK, we're getting closer! Could you try the links contained in this article -- (URL) the last indented one which bounces to www.yahoo.com)? If that shows no delay for you under MSIE, then it's probably a good bet that the multiple (URL) (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) Consistent across platforms using both IE 5.01 and IE 5.5. I did notice that using Navigator 4.08 on NT 4 showed now delay at all. So this is at least partially a problem with IE, which is not much of a surprise, but then again, IE is the only (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) OK, good, then this has nothing to do with jump.cgi per se (not that I thought it did, but it's better to be sure just in case). You're seeing the same thing from a different redirector. (The display.cgi script simply picks apart the ng name (...) (26 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
