 | | Quick idea....
|
|
Hey guys, Just thought of something. It may or may not have been thought of before. What about having 'community editors' for the links on the sides of the web interface pages?? This way, people whose active interest is in a specific group can log (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Link to Lego Direct
|
|
(...) Do you mean (URL) ? HTH. -Adam (26 years ago, 16-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Link to Lego Direct
|
|
ought to be on the (URL) page. Or somewhere. Right now I need it for something and can't find it. Searching with obvious keywords is turning up too many hits. ++Lar (26 years ago, 16-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | lugnet.org.it ?
|
|
Hi Todd, from a discussion in our lugnet.loc.it newsgroup we have recently pointed out a need for a lugnet.org.it group, to discuss about important plannings, events, features of the ItLUG user group. Is the creation of such a newsgroup possible? (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) I bought a CX and a DA (I'll have to check, I think they both have the D pattern on the front). As far as quality goes... the Beefy T feels a little thinner than I recall them being. The artwork looks like some type of iron-on process, not (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) First of all, I like the concept of the shirts. I used to wear my Green Day shirt everywhere back when they were nobodys, and then if someone recognized it, they knew that both of you had that rare thing in common. Lugnet shirts offer the same (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!
|
|
(...) Do the higher prices of the "art" designs seem offensive in any way, or just strange? Do they discourage purchasing of the lower-priced "standard" designs? How do people feel about the prices as a whole? Basically none of the shirts are (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Mousepad & Mug preview #2 (was: Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!)
|
|
(...) Hey, I'm using my landscape mousepad in a portrait configuration right now ;-). Why? Not enough space on my desk! Maybe I'll have to order one of these revolutionary mousepads!. FUT lugnet.off-topic.fun Eric Kingsley The New England LEGO Users (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Mousepad & Mug preview #2 (was: Re: LUGNET T-Shirts are in!)
|
|
(...) Mostly for design/layout reasons in two of the three cases, but also because I've never understood why landscape mousepads even exist in the first place, not having ever met anyone who's had the horizontal room on their desk to use the pad in (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
|
Yeah but you try finding what you want, from the viewpoint of someone who hasn't been here for very long and doesn't know how versatile Lugnet is, if only one could find what one wants in it ... Piece references seem to turn up in a lot of places (...) (26 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: How about a my.netscape-style RDF for portals?
|
|
(...) I must chime in here... 'though it cert'nly isn't going to be at the top of his priorities now, I suppose. (uh-oh... Jeremy, you're steeling my a's 'gain, huh? ;-) <snip> That would be great... whoa. That would be just *fabulous*. I can't wait (...) (26 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: How about a my.netscape-style RDF for portals?
|
|
(...) (even though I know Todd is a particularly busy person, and has many other probably more important hot-item issues to work on...) Me too! I'm getting more and more excited about the potential for a portalized LUGNET, since we're starting work (...) (26 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
|
(...) True - but that would take a lot of combined effort. The question is, do we need a temporary solution *until* there's a permanent, searchable db? (...) Uh, probably he has other things on his mind right now, see (URL) (...) Yeah - they don't (...) (26 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
|
(...) You didn't mention FUT, so I'm ignoring this bit. (...) I'd rather not see db.inv's charter changed. I think a new group would be better. Actually, the true, proper solution is a queryable database. Maybe that's why Todd Lehman is staying out (...) (26 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Geoffrey Hyde wrote: (about the various groups under discussion) (...) The thing is, all the groups (.cad.dat.parts, .db.brictionary, .db.inv, and .db.scans) are very clear-cut in their purposes, and none of them are in (...) (26 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | How about a my.netscape-style RDF for portals?
|
|
It would be neat if you served up the same kind of first-few-post views from each LUGNET group as an RDF so that they could be added as channels. (26 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:3t6mms4nv2q1fgv...4ax.com... (...) They'd probably be covered with the one cent GST adds to that because of rounding up to the nearest cent. :) (...) spell*) (...) was (...) Perhaps, but (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Cancelling Posts?
|
|
Quoting a post posted six months ago .... Has a facility for cancelling posts via the web interface been implemented? I wrote in this post that I go fire up a newsreader when I want to cancel a post, but my NNTP access has become so dicey that I no (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux
|
|
(...) Either would be good. I could come up with advantages of either way. I have a preference for appending the .marketplace groups to the theme hierarchies for ease of reading via the web interface. On the other hand, placing them all within a (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux
|
|
(...) I (...) after (...) P. (...) both (...) who (...) I remember that. There was a lot of discussion about it. (...) The (...) calls (...) always (...) website (...) All right. My memories of this are rather foggy, I guess. This sounds like a good (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
