 | | Re: a few new things
|
|
"LUGNET Admin" <suz@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:Gx9574.qt@lugnet.com... (...) of (...) is (...) from the (...) often (...) stick (...) have (...) blah, (...) The following are just my opinions, so don't be too offended by them... I think that (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
(...) I would like a button. I really hate (for example, sorry Dan) peeron.com, where I type in a set number, then click "sets", and have to click back on the text field & hit enter. (...) My advice would be "restraint". The home page is more for (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
(...) of (...) A few comments: My monitor is set for 1024 pixel width and I still have to scroll sideways to see everything. A lot of people are still on 800x600 even. Some of the labels on the button bar at the top say "LUGNET xxx" and some don't. (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
(...) Great work! About the search button question - I think that it would be a good idea to have a button, some people might feel lost without one. It's better to have an extra way to do something than to not have enough. A small suggestion: have a (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | a few new things
|
|
hi. for those of you who love progress... I have a few things to reveal that are not ready for "real" announcement yet. I'm open to feedback as I work. (I know how you guys *love* to provide feedback.. wink) I started an Admin Help Wanted list: (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: What's next for MindStorms
|
|
(...) only that the offending messages come from one of the mailing lists gateways - we have very little control what the list accepts - so unlike mails sent to LUGNET directly, we can't block broken mailers (like some exchange versions, iirc), that (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: What's next for MindStorms
|
|
(...) My replies appear to thread correctly... I was referring to this thread, starting here: (URL) reply to 18038 which appears in this thread: (URL) is a reply to 18033 appearing in the original thread: (URL) clues here? -Rob. (24 years ago, 3-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Does lugnet have the right 'look and feel'?
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Kyle Beatty writes: [lots of snipping here...] (...) Hmm...I agree the front page could use a few modifications here and there, but overall, I think it is easily navigatable (on the contrary to the original home page), and (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Does lugnet have the right 'look and feel'?
|
|
(...) freshening up, but the appearance and performance of the site overall are hugely satisfying to me. Yes, that is right. The design of the site satisfies me a lot! I find your correspondents' impressions baffling. Are they perhaps confusing (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: What's next for MindStorms
|
|
(...) what mail client do you use to post? Some mail clients don't put the correct headers in the reply, making it impossible to thread. Dan (24 years ago, 1-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
