 | | Name for Set 10019 —Steve Bliss
|
| | | I just was at Target, ogling the beautiful 10019. Man, were those boxes heavy! I noticed that the box was clearly labeled "Tantive IV", *not* "Rebel Blockade Runner". Steve (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Name for Set 10019 —Dan Boger
|
| | | | | (...) hmmm... that conflicts with the name from lego.com, which does say RBR... I _think_ the name on the box is the name we should use, but I'm not sure... anyone else have an opinion here? (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Name for Set 10019 — Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | | | (...) I'd prefer the box name. If we used Tantive IV, we can put RBR in curly quotes for the time being. (I'd put the note in 'notes', but then it won't come up in a search.) how does that sound? -Suz (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Name for Set 10019 —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) Sounds like a plan! Conversely if for whatever reason the name chosen (or switched to later) is RBR, I would advocate similarly putting Tantive IV in curlies... (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Name for Set 10019 — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Ya, the box name is the most official form of the name. Names from S@H are catalog names, and they're not always correct. Let's put Tantive IV in the name field (with a TM if it's there on the box) and include Rebel Blockade Runner in curlies (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Alternate Set Names [was Re: Name for Set 10019] —Thomas Garrison
|
| | | | | | (...) Then something similar should be done for set 1355? Every box I've ever seen for it says "Temple of Gloom", but for the past several catalogs (and, I see, at shop.lego.com) S@H has called it "Temple Escape Studio" (you've got to wonder if (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Name for Set 10019 —Daniel Crichton
|
| | | | | "Steve Bliss" <partsref@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Gv33KA.8t@lugnet.com... (...) heavy! (...) In that case the name for the retail set is different to the S@H version - my B&W S@H box clearly has "Rebel Blockade Runner" written across it at (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Name for Set 10019 —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) I wondered if this was the case. Somehow, the retail box just looks too polished for LEGO Direct to pay for. ;) (...) Yeah, the boxes I saw at Target had "Tantive IV" printed in 3" lettering in the bottom left corner of the box front. Steve (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Name for Set 10019 — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Are there actually two versions?? If you order one from S@H, does the box say Rebel Blockade Runner?? Or does the S@H one say Tantive IV when it arrives? --Todd (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Name for Set 10019 —Daniel Crichton
|
| | | | | | "Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:Gv4KKu.5I6@lugnet.com... (...) The box I had from S@H in the UK back in November when the "RBR" first came out definitely has "REBEL BLOCKADE RUNNER" in very large letters across the bottom of (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Name for Set 10019 —Daniel Crichton
|
| | | | | | | "Daniel Crichton" <danielc@helio.co.uk> wrote in message news:Gv4p04.GB9@lugnet.com... (...) box (...) came (...) the (...) I've uploaded a photo of my RBR box to BrickShelf - and yes, it really is black & white for those who haven't seen the (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Name for Set 10019 —Daniel Crichton
|
| | | | | | "Daniel Crichton" <danielc@helio.co.uk> wrote in message news:Gv4p04.GB9@lugnet.com... (...) box (...) came (...) the (...) Just for completeness I've uploaded another pic to (URL) is of the information plate that comes with the S@H version of the (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Name for Set 10019 —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | [X-POST to lugnet.starwars; FUT lugnet.admin.database] (...) I couldn't tell you anything about the plaque in the retail version - it's going to be awhile until I scrape up the $200 for one. Anyone else want to chime in on this? Steve (22 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Name for Set 10019 —Gregory Smith
|
| | | | | | (...) I just opened the retail version I purchased at TRU last Friday, and was surprised to open the box to find the B&W S@H box inside! It was a clever idea, as the kit is quite heavy so the double box provides some extra sturdiness needed to stand (...) (22 years ago, 2-May-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Name for Set 10019 —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | (...) Yup, that's what mine is like also. Looks like this set has two box names. Todd and/or Suz, looks like you need to make a decision which is the primary name. I would tend to vote for the retail name (on the other hand, since no matter which (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Name for Set 10019 — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Aha! OK, that's cool -- the ship's real name! So does it have a TM symbol after the IV? For as long as I can remember back (I guess about 1990 was the first S@H catalog I received), LEGO S@H had always had a set or two in the catalog with the (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Name for Set 10019 —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) :) (...) Yes, it does. Sorry I left that out. "Tantive IV™" is printed on the box. (...) Heh, yeah. :\ Steve (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | |
