Subject:
|
Re: Name for Set 10019
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:45:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
176 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.database, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> In lugnet.admin.database, Dan Boger writes:
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 06:04:58PM +0000, Steve Bliss wrote:
> > > I just was at Target, ogling the beautiful 10019. Man, were those boxes
> > > heavy!
> > >
> > > I noticed that the box was clearly labeled "Tantive IV", *not* "Rebel
> > > Blockade Runner".
> >
> > hmmm... that conflicts with the name from lego.com, which does say
> > RBR... I _think_ the name on the box is the name we should use, but I'm
> > not sure... anyone else have an opinion here?
>
> I'd prefer the box name. If we used Tantive IV, we can put RBR in curly
> quotes for the time being. (I'd put the note in 'notes', but then it won't
> come up in a search.)
>
> how does that sound?
Sounds like a plan!
Conversely if for whatever reason the name chosen (or switched to later) is
RBR, I would advocate similarly putting Tantive IV in curlies...
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Name for Set 10019
|
| (...) I'd prefer the box name. If we used Tantive IV, we can put RBR in curly quotes for the time being. (I'd put the note in 'notes', but then it won't come up in a search.) how does that sound? -Suz (23 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
