Subject:
|
Re: Name for Set 10019
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 18:27:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
171 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.database, Dan Boger writes:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 06:04:58PM +0000, Steve Bliss wrote:
> > I just was at Target, ogling the beautiful 10019. Man, were those boxes
> > heavy!
> >
> > I noticed that the box was clearly labeled "Tantive IV", *not* "Rebel
> > Blockade Runner".
>
> hmmm... that conflicts with the name from lego.com, which does say
> RBR... I _think_ the name on the box is the name we should use, but I'm
> not sure... anyone else have an opinion here?
I'd prefer the box name. If we used Tantive IV, we can put RBR in curly
quotes for the time being. (I'd put the note in 'notes', but then it won't
come up in a search.)
how does that sound?
-Suz
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Name for Set 10019
|
| (...) Sounds like a plan! Conversely if for whatever reason the name chosen (or switched to later) is RBR, I would advocate similarly putting Tantive IV in curlies... (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | Re: Name for Set 10019
|
| (...) Ya, the box name is the most official form of the name. Names from S@H are catalog names, and they're not always correct. Let's put Tantive IV in the name field (with a TM if it's there on the box) and include Rebel Blockade Runner in curlies (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Name for Set 10019
|
| (...) hmmm... that conflicts with the name from lego.com, which does say RBR... I _think_ the name on the box is the name we should use, but I'm not sure... anyone else have an opinion here? (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
