 | | Re: newsgroups search modifiers ?
|
|
(...) Did that last night; forgot to post about it this morning. --Todd (24 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) I can do that. (...) I'm not sure what you mean here by "used to be" and "separately." (...) Maybe it can swing back to that if I move things to a faster box and if not everyone selects the always-display option. :) --Todd (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) I would like to express my preference for this solution as well, with the "my info" part repeated at the top, and maybe with a link to go back (although I'm not clear why the back button isn't good enough for that, it's faster if the page (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: New Lego Guide Look
|
|
(...) Actually, I think this is a good compromise for those features. I don't always need those references, but if I want them, there they are ready for use. Moreover, some of the Notes were somewhat silly -- and if that feature (in particular) was (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) Coincidental this should come up. I've just started using the Opera browser on a PC, and was dismayed to see that the Guide pages showed up as really, really wide - the lists of members' names weren't wrapping to the screen, so the notes and (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) oh, being QA, I have to mention... :) there's no way right now to get back to the set info, from any of the subpages... All in all, I didn't mind seeing everything there, but I do understand issues like server load and some comments... :/ (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
I personally would like the 4 sub pages on a single page. Formatted the way it used to be, just separately. (I actually liked the cookies idea best, so i could have the option, but i'll settle for the above :) ) 4 pages is not "at a glance". (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) Still leaves a bottleneck, unfortunately. (...) You mean repeating the "My Collection" box in the sub-page(s)? Or glomming the four sub-pages into a single sub-page? --Todd (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) Back when the personal set data was first introduced to the Guide, Todd and I had discussed that very idea: (URL) to point 3). How about this idea?: If someone is a LUGNET member and are logged into LUGNET, they can toggle a setting that (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: New Lego Guide Look
|
|
(...) (URL) a CPU and bandwidth issue. In the extreme, some of the sets contain over 100 entries and the numbers are always going up. I thought about doing some kind of cutoff but I don't know how fair that would be. --Todd (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) The display of the lists on every set lookup was the number two bottleneck in the webserver's CPU load. --Todd (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) :-( You know more about LUGNET server load than I do, but is it really that much bandwidth to load some extra text? Not to sound negative. . .but seeing this a few minutes ago just depressed me. The utility of the LUGNET database has just (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) I don't like it either, especially when it shows up right in your face on a set DB page. For reasons of server load and the above, I've moved the notes and buy/sell/own listings to subpages that you can click up if you want to see them. It (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Some data on set 2_7
|
|
(...) I just noticed that set 2_7 has been updated with a 149 piece count from the box of set 105, which directly contradicts the 184 piece count from an actual set #2 box. (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | 1356 update
|
|
I bought myself a handful of small sets at TRU today, and have found data for one of them is missing from the database. So here's an update: 1356 Stunt Man Catapult - 27 pcs - 2 minifigs - $4.99 at TRU (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Brickset vs. Lugnet (Was Re: New Scala sets)
|
|
Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:3A99D9CF.CB7D65...ing.com... (...) Todd may have a problem using Brickset data/images but personally I am happy for him and the other contributers to do so. (...) Unfortunately Todd and I (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: New Scala sets
|
|
(...) willing to "borrow" pictures from Brickset). (...) I wish we could see a merging of the data from Brickshelf and Lugnet. Lugnet in general has a better engine, but Brickset is definitely more complete in many areas. Frank (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.scala, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Basic set #4219 {Extra Bricks}
|
|
Basic set #4219 is in the database, but does not have a piece count. It contains 288 pieces. Martin (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: New Scala sets
|
|
(...) Hi Frank, no more need to use your scanner as I also got a Belville set this weekend and uploaded the new sets to www.brickset.com . Simply use the direct link if you only need the new Scala images: (URL) entire 2001 section is constantly (...) (24 years ago, 25-Feb-01, to lugnet.scala, lugnet.admin.database)
|
