 | | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) oh, being QA, I have to mention... :) there's no way right now to get back to the set info, from any of the subpages... All in all, I didn't mind seeing everything there, but I do understand issues like server load and some comments... :/ (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
I personally would like the 4 sub pages on a single page. Formatted the way it used to be, just separately. (I actually liked the cookies idea best, so i could have the option, but i'll settle for the above :) ) 4 pages is not "at a glance". (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) Still leaves a bottleneck, unfortunately. (...) You mean repeating the "My Collection" box in the sub-page(s)? Or glomming the four sub-pages into a single sub-page? --Todd (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) Back when the personal set data was first introduced to the Guide, Todd and I had discussed that very idea: (URL) to point 3). How about this idea?: If someone is a LUGNET member and are logged into LUGNET, they can toggle a setting that (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: New Lego Guide Look
|
|
(...) (URL) a CPU and bandwidth issue. In the extreme, some of the sets contain over 100 entries and the numbers are always going up. I thought about doing some kind of cutoff but I don't know how fair that would be. --Todd (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) The display of the lists on every set lookup was the number two bottleneck in the webserver's CPU load. --Todd (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) :-( You know more about LUGNET server load than I do, but is it really that much bandwidth to load some extra text? Not to sound negative. . .but seeing this a few minutes ago just depressed me. The utility of the LUGNET database has just (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) I don't like it either, especially when it shows up right in your face on a set DB page. For reasons of server load and the above, I've moved the notes and buy/sell/own listings to subpages that you can click up if you want to see them. It (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Some data on set 2_7
|
|
(...) I just noticed that set 2_7 has been updated with a 149 piece count from the box of set 105, which directly contradicts the 184 piece count from an actual set #2 box. (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | 1356 update
|
|
I bought myself a handful of small sets at TRU today, and have found data for one of them is missing from the database. So here's an update: 1356 Stunt Man Catapult - 27 pcs - 2 minifigs - $4.99 at TRU (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Brickset vs. Lugnet (Was Re: New Scala sets)
|
|
Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:3A99D9CF.CB7D65...ing.com... (...) Todd may have a problem using Brickset data/images but personally I am happy for him and the other contributers to do so. (...) Unfortunately Todd and I (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: New Scala sets
|
|
(...) willing to "borrow" pictures from Brickset). (...) I wish we could see a merging of the data from Brickshelf and Lugnet. Lugnet in general has a better engine, but Brickset is definitely more complete in many areas. Frank (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.scala, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Basic set #4219 {Extra Bricks}
|
|
Basic set #4219 is in the database, but does not have a piece count. It contains 288 pieces. Martin (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: New Scala sets
|
|
(...) Hi Frank, no more need to use your scanner as I also got a Belville set this weekend and uploaded the new sets to www.brickset.com . Simply use the direct link if you only need the new Scala images: (URL) entire 2001 section is constantly (...) (24 years ago, 25-Feb-01, to lugnet.scala, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: newsgroups search modifiers ?
|
|
(...) There's now a little round blue question mark link graphic that takes you to a help area on searching (just added a few minutes ago). It's not on all of the pages yet, but it is on all of the news pages and on the main homepage. (...) What did (...) (24 years ago, 24-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.technic.classic?
|
|
(...) You can edit the URL manually to put "v=b" at the end, or you can click links to get there. For example, if you start here: (URL) click the "View Plain (without subgroups)" link and that takes you here: (URL) click "Redisplay Messages: Brief" (...) (24 years ago, 24-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: newsgroups search modifiers ?
|
|
(...) I'm no expert, but I think I know what you mean. I've had a similar sounding history. I'll mention it to Todd, trying to reproduce the trouble I had. -Suz. (24 years ago, 24-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: newsgroups search modifiers ?
|
|
(...) OK, I did not see that page. I tried those and it seems to be doing what I wanted. For some reason, I thought I tried those earlier and was not getting the desired result. Lets assume that all is well now. If I see whatever it was I saw (...) (24 years ago, 24-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: newsgroups search modifiers ?
|
|
(...) (URL) you saw this and it doesn't help, Todd should answer your question soon. -Suz (24 years ago, 24-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
