Results 381 – 400 of 403.
|
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
| (...) In fact, it is a direct violation of the TOS. I would suggest that the post be cancelled. Even the images are TOS violations of Maj.com. Conduct such as this is highly unbecoming and very disappointing, Stefan. JOHN (19 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
| |
|  
suggest
(score: 0.640)
|
|
| | Re: .mecha loading slowly??
|
| (...) If the location of .mecha as a subgroup of .build is the reason for the slow loading, we should take another attempt to what (URL) Mark suggested 10 month ago>. Although Mecha isn't an official LEGO theme I'd suggest to put it as a top level (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.638)
|
|
| | Problems with confirming
|
| Hi! I have already discussed this with Matthew Miller, but a final solution is still missing. I can post again, which is good, but I do have problems. When confirming I have to use the link, but the mail does not work. (with is much more convinient (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.633)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with confirming
|
| (...) snip (...) This was once the problem - when trying to contact lugnet admin, it failed, as it was not possible to send mail to lugnet.com - quite a problem as it was not even possible to report it. May I suggest to have another adress for that, (...) (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.633)
|
|
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| In lugnet.general, Jon Palmer wrote: ... (...) I refuse to get angry. It's bad for my health. But I understand why people are upset, believe me. I met with Todd last night regarding LUGNET. Currently, there isn't anything I can do about the (...) (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.629)
|
|
| | Re: Bloviate (was Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!))
|
| (...) That's not quite a good analogy. A government is imposed upon you. LUGNET is a free service that you use (yes, I know there are memberships, but they're structured more like donations). It's sort of like complaining about, say, Google or (...) (18 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.629)
|
|
| | Re: Announcing the new LUGNET Link List
|
| (...) I would suggest the two category headings of: - Local User Groups - Online Communities "Local User Groups" are geographically significant and involve face-to-face meetings and often hold recurring public displays or events. (NELUG, WAMALUG, (...) (18 years ago, 29-Jun-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.622)
|
|
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.622)
|
|
| | Re: Help Wanted
|
| (...) The ToU definitely need an update. They do not reflect several changes in policy, especially regarding market traffic (standing policy seems to discourage ANY market traffic outside the appropriate lugnet.market group, but the ToU only (...) (18 years ago, 28-Jun-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.621)
|
|
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.621)
|
|
| | Re: New Terms of Use for LUGNET
|
| Some thoughts on the discussion group terms: #7: clarify to allow use of FTX. #9.2: I think it would be reasonable to allow auction postings in groups that specifically allow them, though it should be pointed out that set of groups would generally (...) (18 years ago, 18-Sep-06, to lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.614)
|
|
| | Re: New LUGMap for LUGNET
|
| (...) Hi Dan, IMO, "real" maps like maps.google.com, local.live.com or www.frappr.com always look somehow unsightly. They're good for setting places on a very detailed base, like showing residences of club members etc.pp. But for a rundown on LUGs (...) (18 years ago, 14-Nov-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.608)
|
|
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
| Hi, Rene. Firstly, thanks for all the work you are putting into this. I did not get a chance to comment on the (URL) previous draft> (Draft #1), but I've now got the latest draft (Draft #2), Draft #1, and the current LUGENT front pages up (...) (18 years ago, 14-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.606)
|
|
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
| (...) much much better!. a few minor sugestions: eliminate the baby blue bar across the top of the page with the welcome note and put the welcome note in a white box at the center of the page much like the "announcment boxes". this would bring all (...) (18 years ago, 15-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.605)
|
|
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
| (...) renders good in my browser. Looks good on screen. A few comments, which I hope are constructive: "Brickworld 2007(1 Dec 2006) BrickJournal" I mention this only because a lot of the center announcements are for events. This makes it look like (...) (18 years ago, 16-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.605)
|
|
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 3
|
| (...) renders good in my browser. Looks good on screen. A few comments, which I hope are constructive: "Brickworld 2007(1 Dec 2006) BrickJournal" I mention this only because a lot of the center announcements are for events. This makes it look like (...) (18 years ago, 16-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.605)
|
|
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET part 4
|
| (...) I think what bothers me (and maybe this is the case for others) is that these alternating colors are too disimilar--the contast between them is too much. I would suggest replacing the white color with the same light blue as the background of (...) (18 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.605)
|
|
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.600)
|
|
| | Improved email obfuscation
|
| I have a suggestion regarding the spam-prevention obfuscation that is applied to email addresses in (URL) message headers. I think the dummy phrases should not appear at the beginning or end of the address, only interposed between characters of the (...) (17 years ago, 16-Jul-07, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.586)
|
|
| | Re: Change in LUGNET news appearance
|
| (...) The ads in the LUGNET Guide pages are ok, they aren't annoying, it's a good thing. In the newsgroup pages, instead, I would suggest you to change the ad box with a banner in order to limit the scrolling. Even if LUGNET member, I wouldn't log (...) (17 years ago, 14-Dec-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
suggest
(score: 0.572)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
