To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.suggestionsOpen lugnet.admin.suggestions in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Suggestions / 1580
1579  |  1581
Subject: 
Re: Canadian Members by Province/Territory
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.suggestions
Date: 
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:10:56 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
5417 times
  
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Rene Hoffmeister wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Jean-Marc Détraz wrote:
> > Hi, I am writing from Canada, a huge country located north of the United States
> > (where Lugnet members are identified by state). Canada is actually MUCH bigger
> > than the USA, and covers 6 time zones.  We have provinces (and territories) here
> > instead of states, and only 13 of them (instead of 50 in the USA!).
> > 
> > It would be useful to be able to locate members by province.  Perhaps you could
> > send an e-mail to all Canadian members asking them to identify their province
> > (like it is on Bricklink) - or perhaps you already have this information?
> > 
> > Thanks in advance for considering this and thanks for all your hard work!
> > 
> > Jean-Marc Détraz aka legomotive (Lugnet member #98)
> 
> Hi Jean-Marc,
> 
> I will forward this to Jerry and ask him to have a closer look to the user-DB
> structure to see whether it's possible (most likely yes) and how difficult an
> implementation would be, especially a subsequent one.
> 
> Added to the List of Suggestions
> 
> Leg Godt!
> René

Hi Rene,

If it is possible for Canada might I also suggest doing it for Australia too. It
has the same geographic spread issues.

Tim



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Canadian Members by Province/Territory
 
(...) Good idea, Tim. (Spotlighted) Cheers Richie Dulin (20 years ago, 13-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Canadian Members by Province/Territory
 
(...) Hi Jean-Marc, I will forward this to Jerry and ask him to have a closer look to the user-DB structure to see whether it's possible (most likely yes) and how difficult an implementation would be, especially a subsequent one. Added to the List (...) (20 years ago, 13-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)

10 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR