Results 781 800 of about 2200.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
| | Re: My Stance
|
| Lorbaat wrote in message ... (...) it's (...) felt (...) two (...) LEGO (...) do we (...) can (...) As (...) people (...) exist. (...) and (...) never (...) (trust (...) people (...) the (...) full (...) of (...) find a (...) pain (...) internet. (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| internet (score: 0.342) |
|
| | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) Matt, You're going to take this as some kind of slam, or some kind of flame, but it's not intended as one, really. Try to keep that in mind as you read it. I've read pretty much every post resulting from your initial posts of a few days ago. I (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| internet (score: 0.342) |
|
| | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) Well, theres a start. An apology is only part of the act of contrition... one must strive to be better. Regarding emotions...I generally have the emotional range of a turnip, but that does not mean I can be offensive, callous, insensitive, and (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| internet (score: 0.342) |
|
| | Re: My point.
|
| (...) D'oh! I forgot my own footnote. [1] I was there to flame. I enjoy flaming people. I don't think it's a big crime, especially if you keep it to places where it's appropriate, such as alt.usenet.kooks, alt.flame, ne.internet.services (circa (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| internet (score: 0.342) |
|
|
| internet (score: 0.342) |
|
| | Re: Rebirth of Cool LEGO Site of the Week
|
| (...) of the most frustrated person to see it disappear! Anyway, here are some ideas of my own: Format: I think it should be based on the rating of the site, rather than a voting system as it was before. People, probably only Lugnet members, could (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| |
| mail (score: 0.341) |
|
|
| internet (score: 0.341) |
|
| | Re: why no ".dat" email digests?...
|
| (...) (not Suz or Todd, but...) Steve has the right of it. I'm e-mail subscribed to loc.ca, but I do not see any messages in any of the various loc.ca.foo groups. This is IMO, a good thing. thanks, James (22 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 0.341) |
|
|
| internet (score: 0.340) |
|
|
| internet (score: 0.340) |
|
| | Re: why no ".dat" email digests?...
|
| (...) Because 'lugnet.cad.dat' is retired, inactive, no-longer-in-existence. Unless I misunderstand news-by-mail, you only get messages for groups you specifically subscribe to, not all the subgroups under the specific groups. Steve (22 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 0.340) |
|
|
| mail (score: 0.340) |
|
|
| mail (score: 0.340) |
|
| | Re: Group in Subject: Header for News-by-Mail
|
| (...) I suppose I've never thought about actually using mail to *reply* to news. . .yes, it would look really ugly if a user did that, and yes, a user would do that. . . (...) And potentially it could do bad things (probably not, but things have a (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| |
| mail (score: 0.340) |
|
| | Re: offline building instructions...
|
| (...) Cool! Welcome to LUGNET, the friendliest place on the internet. Just watch out for certain characters who have unrealistic expectations of how fast TLC can change. If one of them challenges you, my advice is to ignore him or her. So, what's a (...) (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
| internet (score: 0.340) |
|
| | Group in Subject: Header for News-by-Mail
|
| I suggest that there be an optional feature for those reading LUGNET by mail to have the name of the newsgroup appear in the Subject: line, in the usual fashion. That is, Subject: [lugnet.admin.suggestions] Re: Curator List so users could tell right (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| |
| mail (score: 0.340) |
|
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) That was when, yes, according to my records. (...) But you said in that form that Dylan Bradley was your real-life name. I would appreciate any thoughts you could offer as to how to make it clearer to people that "real-life name" means (...) (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| internet (score: 0.340) |
|
| | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G20t6H.4us@lugnet.com... (...) news:G1zGDI.4Iy@lugnet.com... (...) is (...) addresses (...) show (...) membership (...) I, too, am wondering that <g>... (...) That was inside the membership (...) (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| internet (score: 0.340) |
|
| | Re: Curator List
|
| (...) Yes. It's a good idea, especially for emphasizing groups that would most benefit from some attention. That *open* link could appear on the group's page itself too. We can do that once there's a curator FAQ of some kind for interested parties (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.curators)
| |
| mail (score: 0.340) |
|
|
| mail (score: 0.340) | More: Next Page >>
|