Results 2061 2080 of 2225.
|
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.
|
|
| | Re: Please change my "from" e-mail address in posts
|
| (...) Hi Tony. Have you been to this form yet? (URL) (it's not very obvious that's where you have to go to effect the change, it's on our list of things to fix) Once you do that and we process it, it's changed. No other way is available to do it, in (...) (20 years ago, 13-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 0.936) |
|
| | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
| (...) Deep down I'm extremely worried about the future of this website. When we have an issue like this, where well intentioned people (not me, mind you--I have an apparent issue realizing where I screwed up) who point out very valid concerns about (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 0.936) |
|
|
| mail (score: 0.936) |
|
| | Re: Email address question
|
| (...) I was just curious who was behind that address. I was going to suggest an address that all current admins receive. For instance, several ldraw.org addresses go to Tim and I. I think this helps out since I'm not always immediately available to (...) (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 0.936) |
|
| | Re: UNJUST Singling Out of Chris Magno and Terry P
|
| (...) Agreed. I rarely take part in these forums any more because of this kind of snowballing stupidity. Chris and Terry were hardly the only ones breaking 'posting guidelines'. They were both baited as well, with "nothing new being brought to the (...) (16 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general) !
| |
| mail (score: 0.936) |
|
|
| mail (score: 0.936) |
|
| | Re: Plan of action
|
| (...) Me too. I value everyone's input whether I agree with it or not, as long as it is given in a constructive manner. (...) Yes. It is the one I outlined to you in your mail to me asking me about it and asking about posting here, the one where I (...) (20 years ago, 6-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 0.936) |
|
| | Re: In support of Larry
|
| (...) I thought as much. Try to be more constructive. (...) I don't think recounting events here would be particularly constructive. Why don't you ask him? If he does not tell you, drop me an e-mail. (...) My point was that I have not caused a pile (...) (20 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 0.936) |
|
| | Re: could someone please send me my password.
|
| (...) Right. Sorry for any confusion on my part. When you said "mistakenly erased my lugnet password. could one of you please send it to me." I took that to mean you wanted *IT* sent rather than a new one generated and sent. So I explained, thinking (...) (20 years ago, 8-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 0.936) |
|
| | Re: List of suggestions
|
| (...) Hmm, I tried to respond to this in e-mail, but got trapped twice by spamproofing... E-mailers that hide the destination e-mail behind the name are annoying, you have to know the address is even spam proofed since you just see "To: Larry (...) (20 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 0.934) |
|
| | Re: Email Postings being swallowed
|
| (...) Well definitly a random problem. Maybe I'm just hitting a high point in the random incident generator. Every message I email I BCC myself on. I've never missed one of those. I don't believe my ISP is filtering outbound email. It does filter in (...) (19 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 0.934) |
|
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) While using a "From: ...@lugnet.com" address can help with spam filter issues, I don't think it would have helped in this case, since the problem sounds like it was an actual inability of Larry's mail server to deliver mail to Kevin's. Setting (...) (19 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 0.933) |
|
| | List of suggestions
|
| (URL) give it a boo. If your favorite suggestion didn't make the list, or if you think a different post explains the suggestion better than the one I chose, or if you know more about the status than I did, send me a mail to my LUGNET ID, and I'll (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions) !
| |
| mail (score: 0.933) |
|
| | Some suggestions
|
| I know I've made these in the past, but I don't have time to dig up the original threads, so I'll just repost the suggestions for reference in the new list: Have a way for a member to view a list of all un-authenticated posts. This list could (...) (20 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| |
| mail (score: 0.933) |
|
| | Re: Hmm, another suggestion
|
| (...) Not sure I undestand the question, but what from I get of it, I think Todd would have to answer. I have a favour to ask (again) Can we have one new/revived suggestion per post please rather than 3 paragraphs that have to be read closely to (...) (20 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| |
| mail (score: 0.933) |
|
| | Re: My First MOC
|
| (...) Rather than asking everyone to email you replies, you may want to look into subscribing to the group (perhaps temporarily) by email, via this URL: (URL) first doing this subscription setup: (URL) to get your confirmation code ) XFUT (...) (20 years ago, 9-Apr-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 0.932) |
|
| | Re: Authenticating multiple posts at once *beta*
|
| (...) Well, it works on spamblocked e-mail addresses (those set up at posting setup) not the unblocked addresses that people usually think of as their addresses. That is somewhat counter-intuitive. And since I have yet to receive the e-mail that (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
| mail (score: 0.931) |
|
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) First of all, one can try to get a receipt from the receivers mail program. This is certainly not fool proof, but if you get a receipt, the receiver has almost certainly seen at least the Subject of the mail. If you never get a receipt, you (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 0.931) |
|
|
| mail (score: 0.931) |
|
|
| mail (score: 0.931) | More: Next Page >>
|