LUGNET News : Search Results: pieniazek


Search Results: pieniazek

Results 3801 – 3820 of about 16000.

Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: 0-4-0 Switcher
(...) Most of your "proto" pics are in fact of that HO model I was referring to, it's been done by many manufacturers over the years... however this one: (URL) believe is something quite different. It's a "fireless" steam engine, if I am not (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.trains)

pieniazek
(score: 0.279)

		Train Engine Shed Sneak Peek Photos!
Hello LEGO® train fans! The ILTCO is pleased to announce some exciting news, as part of our growing partnership with The LEGO Company. LEGO has supplied the ILTCO with detailed photos of the new 10027 Train Engine Shed (663 pieces), as debuted at (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.trains) !!

pieniazek
(score: 0.279)

		Re: 0-4-0 Switcher
(...) Ya, yard goats are almost as cute as Critters. This switcher (or one very like it) is extremely well known among old time model railroaders because there were so many copies of an HO model of it sold in the 40s, 50s and 60s... You've captured (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.trains)

pieniazek
(score: 0.279)

		Re: New Train Fan
(...) Great story! Thanks for sharing. (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.trains)

pieniazek
(score: 0.279)

		Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
(...) You're dodging. You say you reject the notion of moral relativism, right? I'm not talking about EQ characters or size. I'm talking about the metrics we already discussed... morally: which one is on the side of right more often? In which (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.279)

		Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
(...) Left in because I'm still hoping for a yes/no answer. Just a "yes" or "no" without any qualification or equivocation. (...) Why? If we postulate a yes to the question above, then why should the DPRK be on "on an even playfield with any other (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.279)

		Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
(...) I'm not here (in this thread) to assert that we're the very best. It's just clear to me that some countries are better than others. I gave an example of a country that's clearly toward the bottom so that there could be no quibbling about the (...) (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.279)

		Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
(...) Quality of life that they delliver to their citizens, and, more importantly, that they're likely to deliver to their citizens in future. It's not about size, it's not about population, it's not about military might, it's not about resources, (...) (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.279)

		Re: Break Out the Cristal (trickle-down economics explained with champagne!)
(...) Sorry, Dave. Some nations are better than others. That's no slur against those who happen to live in the nations that aren't up to snuff. But when you say stuff like "We, all of us, are equal nations", you're being tiresome. Note that I didn't (...) (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.279)

		Re: emoticons
(...) Yay for that. (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)

pieniazek
(score: 0.279)

		Re: A question of VITAL importance:
(...) Like shooting fish in a barrel. :) But, yes, yes I can. Why, I did't criticise any yesterday, or the day before. I let both of Sean's slide. Hey, I can quit anytime I want. (...) Creamy being good and chunky being evil? or are you a chunky (...) (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

pieniazek
(score: 0.279)

		Re: A question of VITAL importance:
(...) (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

pieniazek
(score: 0.279)

		Re: Newspaper Article
(...) Did! Thanks for the post. All publicity is good publicity, I guess, but this is especially good... My only regret is that I didn't get to actually see your "Lego room"... (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.trains.org.scltc)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Outrageous Iraqi Geneva Convention Violation
(...) Let me try it from another tack. You may be contributing to breaking your ideals, yes, and I don't dispute that, but that's it. Your statement above only holds if it is necessarily true that law abiding citizens (you are law abiding) having (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Outrageous Iraqi Geneva Convention Violation
Don't drag the gun debate into this or you'll get responses like the following, which will derail the thread. (...) No, actually, assuming you're a law abiding citizen otherwise, with a healthy respect for the rights of others, and you've been (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Outrageous Iraqi Geneva Convention Violation
(...) The US is mostly good (light grey) and the SH regime is almost completely bad (I can't think of anything good about it at the moment, but maybe there is somewhere some bureaucrat within it doing good). The Geneva convention has been mostly (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Sinfest does it again :)
(...) Sinfest has a habit of making god look rather ridiculous, you know... (one of the reasons it's one of my faves...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		A pox on your house ( was Re: Outrageous Iraqi Geneva Convention Violation
(...) The conversation? Well one could wish far worse fates on the readership than for that particular conversation to cease existing, Dave! You know, you sure do use a lot of "!" in your writing, Dave! And what's more, it seems to incite others to (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: If I were a conspiracy nut...
(...) Are there any other possible explanations? Or is patronage for certain the only reason this contract was awarded? Patronage sucks, I always hate to see it. But how many US companies are there (please excuse me if I leave out French, German, (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Membership question
(...) As I understand it, these are processed in large batches, so it may be several weeks between your payment is sent and when the confirmation email is sent. If it indeed has been an unreasonably long time, I'd try a note to admin@lugnet.com (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

More: Next Page >>