LUGNET News : Search Results: pieniazek


Search Results: pieniazek

Results 3621 – 3640 of about 16000.

Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
(...) .debate doesn't suffer fools gladly, no. If you just waltz in there and tell people you have some Good News for them, you're not likely to get a warm reception. (...) and some silliness, and you have the common sense to tell which is which, (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.281)

		Re: Free Speech, again
(...) Must be from Anime or Manga then. Thanks for that, Mags... whew, that's all settled. (I'm gonna go with her explanation, Dave! Sorry about that, but she's smarter than you, Dave!... you're allegedly not as smart as Tim Robbins, at least (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.281)

		Re: Free Speech, again
(...) Urp! Maybe. Try not to let "brother"(1) Ashcroft know about that, OK? I'm on enough lists as it is. 1 - you used capitalization as if to imply he were a monk, I suppose. I use quotes as if to imply I'm not convinced he's the same species as (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.281)

		Re: Free Speech, again
(...) I honestly don't know! Must be some other forum I hung out on or something. Or maybe I made it up? Who can say. I use it to mean "yes?" (as in, "do you agree?") and only at the end of sentences. Anyone recognise it? Google wasn't much help. No (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.281)

		Re: US S@H Specials, Apr 23 - 29, 2003
(...) Ya I was thinking about that very car after I posted. I may have to give it a go. (...) A dozen? Well that might be a good start for YOU but it would be merely rounding error for me, regrettably. (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.market.shopping)

pieniazek
(score: 0.281)

		Re: Question for the curator
(...) If you can pull that off you will be a master, there are no straight lines on either ship. Thanks for putting this in the sidebar, it had escaped my notice and it's pretty nifty. If the X prize is winnable, Bert Rutan can win it. He rocks. (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.space)

pieniazek
(score: 0.281)

		Re: Free Speech, again
Oh heck, I snipped most of it without regard to whether I agreed with it or not... (...) No they aren't. At least not always. AM I THAT predictable? I'm not a number (in a platform plank somewhere), I'm a free man! But maybe I could make an (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.281)

		Re: "Fictitious Presidency"? How about "Fictitious Oscar"?
(...) That's the downside of this, yes, but preventing future budding Moores from winning might be worth the cost. (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.281)

		Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
(...) Not to overcomplexify but perhaps two nomination paths? One path if you are qualified under the criteria given already, and another, petition based, in which some number of qualified people vouched for you as a viable candidate? (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

pieniazek
(score: 0.281)

		Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
(...) what the differences are, which is a good thing. How did you generate it? (I know your aversion to MS and suspect you didn't use MS Word for the generation :) ) Hopefully some automatic way so we can be sure all the differences are (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

pieniazek
(score: 0.281)

		Re: Free Speech, again
(...) Suppose you were right... So what? This case isn't about free speech the way I read it. It's about false advertising. If it would be wrong for you as a person to deny you owned a sweatshop when actually you did, it owuld be wrong for Nike to (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.281)

		Re: Free Speech, again
(...) Technically: TANSTAAFL (there aint no such thing as a free lunch) and desserts form part of lunch. At least around here they do. (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.281)

		Re: Free Speech, again
(...) Me. Who's going to pay for it??? There are no free goods, you know that already, Dave! (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.281)

		Re: Free Speech, again
(...) Na. You show ME where it's guaranteed they don't! Remember, enumeration of rights is not necessarily exhaustive. (...) How so? If they mail in their utterances and they get published, it doesn't matter where they were when they were uttered, (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.281)

		Re: Free Speech, again
(...) Well you shouldn't have snipped it without comment, then. Snipping stuff around here tends to mean you agree, ne? (not always but of course...) (...) Wouldn't that be a "greater advocate of free pudding"? (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.281)

		Re: US S@H Specials, Apr 23 - 29, 2003
(...) Oh ya, been there, done that. :-) What's always good is the notes you get from befuddled sellers, wondering what you are up to and some hoping to dump other dross on you. I'm wondering when it's going to happen to me for THIS part: (URL) part (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.market.shopping)

pieniazek
(score: 0.281)

		Re: US S@H Specials, Apr 23 - 29, 2003
(...) There's an SKU shortage. Combine the doors and windows (in the right proportion) and an SKU is freed up for something else. That's goodness, in my view, as one does where formerly 2 were used. However I blow hot and cold on this, there are (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.market.shopping)

pieniazek
(score: 0.281)

		Re: Crowd Control (was: Train Layout Tables)
(...) Within the last two weeks, IIRC, and it is indeed nifty. See admin.general for more if you're interested... the question is off-topic for trains.org (grin). (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 0.281)

		Re: The U.S. Economy: The Thousand Yard Stare Through the Years
(...) Stangl, stop scaring the children. (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.281)

		Re: Free Speech, again
(...) Note that the cited article doesn't say what exactly the original suit is about, exactly. If Nike was lying about conditions in factories, there may well be grounds for a libel suit there if you can just find the party libeled. Or a fraudulent (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.281)

More: Next Page >>