LUGNET News : Search Results: pieniazek


Search Results: pieniazek

Results 2701 – 2720 of about 16000.

Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
(...) I hope not. It's certainly not my overt intent! I think sharing's great, if you want to share. I just don't want to see authors put in a position where they are forced to share either to participate at all, or in order to be on an equal (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

		Re: More ammunition?
(...) Snipped the second URL, it seems munged, but you can go upthread to find it. (...) That's a small number from a large population. Is the increase statistically significant? Also on the Australian stats cited upthread, what is/was the overall (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

		Re: A retrospective on moral clarity
(...) So, then... Is it better to play the realpolitik game, with the State Department and the CIA careerists running things with or without (mostly with) the connivance of the current administration of whatever color/stripe/type? Or... is it better (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

		Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
(...) I am not so keen on it, it sort of smacks of potential discrimination against entries that choose not to do so. If we are going for a level playing field let's get completely level. (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

		Re: January Meeting!
(...) Um, I thought(0) it was "everybody is supposed to chip in and buy the participant who traveled the farthest(1) to be in Boston within the last 5 days a cool set" I can hardly wait! Hope LFB doesn't show up from South Africa or something and (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

		Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
(...) Scenes, I guess, as you would think of them now, but some (all?) of them may have been submitted prior to the MoTM/SoTM split. But I've got one in mind for MoTM right now, and I choose MoTM because I think it would be poorly served to be in a (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

		Re: Unique Challenge of The Primo Cat
(...) I'm betting this isn't the software that Big Ben Bricks used for their recent work. :-) If it's from EDS it's probably kinda spendy. (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

		Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
(...) Several, actually. (...) I think it is an issue, and worse, I think it highlights an underlying issue of larger import. In an ideal world the Steering Committee would either have given Orion authority to organize the contest as he sees fit, or (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

		Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
(...) I think you're signing yourself up for a lot of work but it's a terrifically nifty idea! (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

		Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
(...) I would too, IF they weren't the original author. And making the dat public enables that sort of behaviour far too easily. Hence my aversion to it. On the other hand, if they were the author, I think it's perfectly fine. If your model is good (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

		Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
(...) To which post? Your post? (...) All the rest of the thread before your post is irrelevant? I'm not sure that's what you meant to say, you may want to consider a rewording to clarify. (...) I disagree. While they may not have been the decision (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

		Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
(...) I found this question somewhat surprising, frankly. (...) I'm hoping that it only appears to be the central issue because the rest of the proposal has met with general agreement and that if this issue can be resolved, it will be speedily (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

		Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
(...) OK, I'll accept that and agree that it's a goal of the contest. Going forward though, I think we're still suffering from not having formal organization in place, in an ideal world this proposal would have passed through the steering committee (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

		Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
(...) I looked here: (URL) and here: (URL) I didn't see that as an explicitly stated goal. I may have missed it somewhere else though. (...) I'm not sure I agree. Perhaps slightly less than if they are. I think there are lots of learning (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

		Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
(...) I think this is an unreasonable restriction. I'd be interested in understanding why this is something that should be insisted on. In the offline discussions prior to presenting this proposal and elsewhere in the thread, there seem to be a (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

		Re: an 'improved' coupler design
(...) Neat find. Thanks for sharing. I am thinking that judicious use of these would allow very very long trains to be run. (...) I hope you do! (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.trains, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

		LDraw.org Ad-Hoc Organizing Committee - Wrap-Up and Thank You
The LDraw.org Ad-Hoc Organizing Committee (4+1) would like to take the time to publicly wrap up its duties as the provisional authority for LDraw.org with a few words. First, a big thank-you to everyone who helped in the organizing process. We thank (...) (20 years ago, 14-May-04, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.org, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

		Re: Any finds at Target?
(...) Sniff, we all miss that one. Especially on those rare occasions when we locals could beat you, or your minion, to it and actually GET some deals instead of just see evidence that there had been some there. :-) (...) January GATS is coming up. (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.market.shopping)

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

		Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
(...) If you want to focus on presentation, then Scene is the contest for you, that's the idea behind this idea. Leveling the playing field via automation encourages everyone to focus on the model. We DON'T want someone to win because they had (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

		Re: hey you!!!
(...) approximately 75 percent... don't forget the leap leap rules :-) (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

pieniazek
(score: 0.306)

More: Next Page >>