Results 181 – 200 of about 16000.
|
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.
|
|
| |
|  
pieniazek
(score: 0.388)
|
|
 | | Re: Tyre (tire) nomenclature
|
| (...) I support this general notion, would like to see everything in LDU and think the original molded description should go in KEYWORDS (perhaps with a qualifyer "molded" or something?) ~~~~ (19 years ago, 30-Apr-06, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.387)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.385)
|
|
| | Re: MDP (was: Questions about fan involvement with TLC)
|
| (...) Berate you? Not me, at any rate, although I can't speak for anyone else. But I DO find it interesting how you hone in on just one point so often. I do think in this case it's an interesting point, though. To widen it out a bit, it certainly (...) (19 years ago, 11-Apr-06, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.385)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.385)
|
|
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) John's not an admin. A PERMANENT ban would still be shotgun against puppy without prior warning, IMHO. A temporary ban is what apparently has been imposed though. (wasn't very clear at first, still isn't very clear although it is somewhat (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.384)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.384)
|
|
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) I see nothing inconsistent here. Eric should get an indefinite timeout until he requests cancels on the posts that clearly are over the line, acknowledges he erred and that the ToS does apply to him, and apologises for causing part of the (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people) !
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.384)
|
|
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) Me for one. It was deserved but I sincerely hope this is a timeout, to be lifted when Eric apologises and indicates he understands that he needs to comply with the ToS, and will do so, and not a permanent loss. Further, and just as (...) (19 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.384)
|
|
| | Re: Pimp My Mech - The Entries are IN
|
| In lugnet.build.mecha, Chris Doyle wrote: Some very interesting entries but I think this one is a real tourdeforcetobereckonedwith: (URL) UpRev> Unless I missed something I think it's the only one that transforms? (19 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.384)
|
|
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) Well, I *am* pretty disillusioned at this point, so that's a valid (and astute) observation on your part. It's always sad to see something deteriorate, especially something that you invested considerable emotional capital(1) in making a (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.384)
|
|
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) Aaron's post might prod Todd and Suz into actually doing something. My reply might prod them into not doing the things that didn't work last time. That seems helpful to me. Your mileage may vary, of course, but those who do not learn from (...) (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.384)
|
|
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) That's certainly one approach... Or... Find some other suckers (Frank, Lenny, Kelly, Tim and Lar having been used up already), form another transition team, tell them that this time you both REALLY mean it, that you're really going to let them (...) (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.384)
|
|
| | Re: 9v Train status report.
|
| In lugnet.trains, Eric Kingsley wrote: (some interesting ideas) That's all well and good, and I think a website might be useful but it's not the way to prove the line is viable. That requires driving demand. But how? What are the chances of LEGO (...) (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.384)
|
|
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
| (...) Maybe you esteem them, but I don't. Anyway, I didn't see them in this thread, which is the thread I was talking about, but if they turn up and act like Allister or Soren or you, I'll be sure to add them to my mental list. Here's the thing, (...) (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX) !!
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.384)
|
|
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
| (...) That might be YOUR list of trolls but it's not mine. Mine is much shorter Allister, Soren, Ross I mean, really... putting kind, helpful, courteous, and thoughtful David Koudys in the same list as Allister? That's a bit of a stretch. Hope that (...) (19 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX) !
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.384)
|
|
| | Re: Murfle?
|
| For the record: There is no point in being concerned that something new is being imposed. That post was first murfled a long time ago. I know that to be the case, because I did it. It may have been unmurfled/murfled a few times since, or not, I have (...) (19 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms) !
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.384)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.384)
|
|
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
| (...) Yep. To summarise, Eric's in the wrong regarding posting auctionspam, and regarding using material of others without permission, and you and your gang of trolls are using that as an excuse to be disruptive, make fun of him, and egg him on (...) (19 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms) !
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.384)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.384)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
