To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: pieniazek
 Results 201 – 220 of about 16000.
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
 
(...) I think that's actually about 1100 lbs, not 1.1 lbs. But I could be wrong. That would be a pretty impresive mini sumo bot though, I gotta say. Can you fit it in a 10 inch cube per the trial rules? (without using neutronium plated parts, that (...) (19 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.386)

  Re: "Caddyshack" Animatronics On TCLTC Layout
 
(...) Seemed to work for me. You have to have Quicktime of course. Well done. Clearly that took Lotsofworkbehindthescenes. A real tourdeforcetobereckonedwith. Spotlightedthanksforsharing. ++Lar (19 years ago, 26-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.town, lugnet.robotics, FTX)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.385)

  Re: "Caddyshack" Animatronics On TCLTC Layout
 
(...) OK, just to be clear, this used sound from a NON LEGO device? :-) Cool. Need some vids (with sound) though. Apropos of nothing except that it was the next pic in the folder: (URL) Kirby> ... what a shame. One of the nicest players in baseball. (...) (19 years ago, 25-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.town, lugnet.robotics, FTX)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.385)

  Re: Shop @ Home Poll: The Next USC Starwars Set
 
(...) Thanks, Jeff. The poll is possibly flawed, in that it has space for a writein but no checkbox to say 'writein', and it will not accept a submission for just the writein, I had to check one of the choices as well. Maybe you know who to tell, I (...) (19 years ago, 24-Mar-06, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.385)

  Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
 
(...) See Sore Thumbs (the webcomic) lately. I'd give you a link but not from behind this firewall... (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.385)

  Re: Thoughts on the UN "Racist" poster?
 
(...) The UN doesn't have embassies, as far as I know. (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.385)

  Re: Thoughts on the UN "Racist" poster?
 
(...) Dejure it's out of copyright/trademark, true, but defacto it will be LEGO that will be influenced the most by any ill will engendered. Most people's first thought, I would expect, would be "hey those are legos" (with some small subset thinking (...) (19 years ago, 21-Mar-06, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.385)

  Re: Thoughts on the UN "Racist" poster?
 
(...) I like the older posters the UNHCR did using minifigs a lot better. (from Jacob's site, there are other examples: (URL) ) (19 years ago, 21-Mar-06, to lugnet.mediawatch)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.385)

  Re: A castle fan's Train plan
 
(...) No, typically passenger cars have equipment(blowers, compressors, heaters, coolers, etc), tanks (air, water, fuel, waste), and other things underneath the floors. As you move forward in time, the amount of stuff increases. (an 1860s wire truss (...) (19 years ago, 21-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.385)

  Re: CN engine WIP
 
(...) Jordan spreader Rail Grinder (these are not really suitable for trains as they are MoW) Schnaebel and big load (been done but just a cool car) Pickle car (early 19th century so it uses the vertical vats) Coil Steel car with one cover drawn (...) (19 years ago, 20-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.385)

  Re: lugnet website dead?
 
(...) Right you are. The subject line threw me off... (19 years ago, 19-Mar-06, to lugnet.publish.brickjournal)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.385)

  Re: lugnet website dead?
 
(...) Nice page. Now link it from the sidebar of lugnet.publish.brickjournal (which you're the curator of unless I was reading things wrong) and you'll be all set! I think that was what the original poster was asking for. I could be wrong though. (...) (19 years ago, 19-Mar-06, to lugnet.publish.brickjournal)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.385)

  Re: lugnet website dead?
 
(...) something the curator of the page controls, not LUGNET admins. See (URL) curator is Joe Meno. He may have forgotten to update the page carrying the information. Why not write him about it? Or maybe you're talking about the front page, in that (...) (19 years ago, 18-Mar-06, to lugnet.publish.brickjournal)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.385)

  Re: CN engine WIP
 
(...) I think I may not have spoken clearly, my apologies. Older hood units have 2 hoods, one long one and one short one. With a safety cab (or full width cab and nose) the engine only has one hood, the long one, which in this paint scheme carries (...) (19 years ago, 17-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.384)

  Re: CN engine WIP
 
(...) Not bad, but a bit stubby, as others have said. Try making the cab a bit shorter. That gives a stud or two more to the hood and hides the disproportionality. Also, consider black trucks instead of gray. Gray is a bit too light for most protos (...) (19 years ago, 17-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.384)

  Re: Brownstone (but, it is tan)
 
(...) Nice. This was one of the "secret" buildings from last month, right? It came out sweet. (SL, TFS) ++Lar (19 years ago, 13-Mar-06, to lugnet.town)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.384)

  Re: Super Chief set not ready for prime-time
 
(...) wonder? Way better solution than knifing away plastic if it works... ++Lar (19 years ago, 12-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.384)

  Re: MOC: MAN 5t military transporter
 
(...) Very pretty. For people like me who are 6 wide train heads, is this vehicle as is too wide to fit in at 8? Put another way... Many US military vehicles are quite wide... how wide is this one in real life? Did you post it to modelteam because (...) (19 years ago, 26-Feb-06, to lugnet.build.military, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.town, FTX)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.383)

  Re: Proposed new colour
 
(...) Yes, POV keyword MATERIAL I think. Thanks. <font color="green">[[User...Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/...ns/Lar|c]] 18:44, 26 February 2006 (UTC) (19 years ago, 26-Feb-06, to lugnet.cad)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.383)

  Re: Proposed new colour
 
(...) OK, well sorry, I guess I wasn't very clear. Would this new color be one that should also be processed separately/special? By POV? By the cad programs? It sounds like you alreeady worked up the necessary SURFACE settings (I think that's the (...) (19 years ago, 26-Feb-06, to lugnet.cad, FTX)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.383)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR